Affiliation:
1. Neurological Rehabilitation Hospital, RehaNova Köln, 51109 Cologne, Germany
2. Department of Rehabilitation and Special Education, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
3. Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
Abstract
Non-invasive brain stimulation, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), has been shown to increase the outcome of speech and language therapy (SLT) in chronic aphasia. Only a few studies have investigated the effect of add-on tDCS on SLT in the early stage of aphasia; this may be due to methodological reasons, in particular the influence of spontaneous remission and the difficulty of establishing stimulation protocols in clinical routines. Thirty-seven participants with subacute aphasia (PwA) after stroke (23 men, 14 women; mean age 62 ± 12 years; mean duration 49 ± 28 days) were included in two consecutive periods of treatment lasting two weeks each. During the first period (P1) the participants received 10 sessions of SLT, during the second period (P2) the aphasia therapy was supplemented by anodal left hemispheric 2 mA tDCS over the left hemisphere. Severity-specific language tests (Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT), n = 27 and Bielefeld Aphasia Screening-Reha (BIAS-R), n = 10) were administered before P1, between P1 and P2, and after P2. Where information was available, the results were corrected for spontaneous remission (AAT sample), and the therapy outcomes of P1 and P2 were compared. Participants’ overall language abilities improved significantly during P1 and P2. However, improvement—as measured by the AAT profile level or the BIAS-R mean percentage value—during P2 (with tDCS) was significantly higher than during P1 (p < 0.001; AAT sample and p = 0.005; BIAS-R sample). Thus, tDCS protocols can be implemented in early aphasia rehabilitation. Despite the limitations of the research design, which are also discussed from an implementation science perspective, this is preliminary evidence that an individually tailored anodal tDCS can have a significant add-on effect on the outcome of behavioral aphasia therapy in subacute aphasia.
Reference106 articles.
1. Prevalence of aphasia and dysarthria among inpatient stroke survivors: Describing the population, therapy provision and outcomes on discharge;Mitchell;Aphasiology,2021
2. Epidemiology of aphasia attributable to first ischemic stroke: Incidence, severity, fluency, etiology, and thrombolysis;Engelter;Stroke,2006
3. Poststroke aphasia : Epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment;Berthier;Drugs Aging,2005
4. Quality of Life in Aphasia: State of the Art;Hilari;Folia Phoniatr. Logop. Off. Organ Int. Assoc. Logop. Phoniatr. (IALP),2015
5. Health-related quality of life in people with severe aphasia;Hilari;Int. J. Lang. Commun. Disord.,2009