Age-Based Developmental Biomarkers in Eye Movements: A Retrospective Analysis Using Machine Learning

Author:

Hunfalvay Melissa12ORCID,Bolte Takumi1,Singh Abhishek1,Greenstein Ethan3,Murray Nicholas P.4ORCID,Carrick Frederick Robert5678ORCID

Affiliation:

1. RightEye LLC., 6107A, Suite 400, Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA

2. Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

3. Washington University in St. Louis, 1 Brookings Dr., St. Louis, MO 63130, USA

4. Visual Motor Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA

5. Neurology, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL 23816, USA

6. Centre for Mental Health Research in Association with University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 9AJ, UK

7. MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA 02129, USA

8. Carrick Institute Neurology, Cape Canaveral, FL 32920, USA

Abstract

This study aimed to identify when and how eye movements change across the human lifespan to benchmark developmental biomarkers. The sample size comprised 45,696 participants, ranging in age from 6 to 80 years old (M = 30.39; SD = 17.46). Participants completed six eye movement tests: Circular Smooth Pursuit, Horizontal Smooth Pursuit, Vertical Smooth Pursuit, Horizontal Saccades, Vertical Saccades, and Fixation Stability. These tests examined all four major eye movements (fixations, saccades, pursuits, and vergence) using 89 eye-tracking algorithms. A semi-supervised, self-training, machine learning classifier was used to group the data into age ranges. This classifier resulted in 12 age groups: 6–7, 8–11, 12–14, 15–25, 26–31, 32–38, 39–45, 46–53, 54–60, 61–68, 69–76, and 77–80 years. To provide a descriptive indication of the strength of the self-training classifier, a series of multiple analyses of variance (MANOVA) were conducted on the multivariate effect of the age groups by test set. Each MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate effect on age groups (p < 0.001). Developmental changes in eye movements across age categories were identified. Specifically, similarities were observed between very young and elderly individuals. Middle-aged individuals (30s) generally showed the best eye movement metrics. Clinicians and researchers may use the findings from this study to inform decision-making on patients’ health and wellness and guide effective research methodologies.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference29 articles.

1. Leigh, J.R., and Zee, D.S. (2012). The Neurology of Eye Movements, Oxford University Press. [5th ed.].

2. Pervasive ocular tremor in patients with Parkinson’s disease;Gitchel;Arch. Neurol.,2012

3. Ghaoui, C. (2005). Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research: Current status and future prospects. Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, Idea Group Publishing.

4. Starkes, J.L., and Ericsson, K.A. (2003). Expert athletes: An integrated approach to decision making. Expert Performance in Sports: Advances in Research on Sport Expertise, Human Kinetics.

5. Volkmar, F.R. (2013). Normative Data. Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders, Springer.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3