Facing Climate Vulnerability in Mountain Areas: The Role of Rural Actors’ Agency and Situated Knowledge Production
-
Published:2023-11-13
Issue:22
Volume:15
Page:15877
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Scotti Ivano1, Ievoli Corrado2ORCID, Bindi Letizia3ORCID, Bispini Sara2ORCID, Belliggiano Angelo2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Social Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy 2. Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Sciences, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy 3. Department of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, and BIOCULT Centre of Research, University of Molise, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
Abstract
Climate change is challenging in mountain areas, and initiatives to define resilience programs appear essential to face global warming impacts. Despite the participatory strategy being primarily considered the best solution to involve local actors in adopting resilience actions, the literature stresses how mountain dwellers, like farmers, are often considered passive subjects, and their ability to understand climate change and the actions to adopt is inadequate. Based on this consideration, we aim to highlight the relevance of the mountain actors’ agency, their “lay” situated knowledge, and the epistemology for co-defining resilience actions. Adopting a “weak version” of the Actor-Network Theory as the research posture, we argue that farmers’ perceptions of climate vulnerability is based on their experience of it, and their resilience actions or suggestions are coherent with their endowment resources (financial and knowledge) and their position in the economic system. In this sense, local actors’ initiatives to face climate change can be limited by their specific position in the socioeconomic contest-related value chain and their specific relationship with local natural settings. A participative strategy to co-define resilience actions can help identify more effective initiatives according to the context between actors. Moreover, it can contribute to the knowledge exchange among “lay” local actors, experts, and policymakers, benefiting everyone; farmers could identify suitable solutions to face climate vulnerability, experts could increase their knowledge of local contexts, and policymakers could define adequate policies. Focusing on a specific area in “Alto Molise” (Italy), we present research results to contribute to the debate on climate resilience in mountain areas, stressing the significance of the local actors’ agency, the presence of the different epistemologies put in play (lay and expert ones), the co-production of knowledge, and the need to actively involve local actors in designing practices and policies to face climate change.
Funder
MOVING projec Horizon 2020 Programme
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference46 articles.
1. Caniglia, B.S., Jorgenson, A., Malin, S.A., Peek, L., Pellow, D.N., and Huang, X. (2021). Handbook of Environmental Sociology, Springer. 2. Social-ecological resilience in remote mountain communities: Toward a novel framework for an interdisciplinary investigation;Stotten;Ecol. Soc.,2021 3. Mountain food products: A broad spectrum of market potential to be exploited;Martins;Trends Food Sci. Technol.,2017 4. Porter, N. (2016). Landscape and Branding: The Promotion and Production of Place, Routledge. 5. European Commission (2019). Europe’s Jewels: Mountains, Islands and Sparsely Populated Areas, European Commission.
|
|