The World as a Gift: Scientific Change and Intelligibility for a Theology of Science

Author:

Marcacci Flavia1,Oleksowicz Michał2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Philosophy, Pontifical Lateran University, 00184 Rome, Italy

2. Faculty of Theology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Toruń, Poland

Abstract

“Truth” and “cause” are essential issues in theology. Truths of faith are meant to remain solid and fundamental and can be traced back to the unique truth of God. The same God is conceived of as the Creator who brought everything into existence before every other cause. Recent discussions about scientific rationality and causality have engaged with the same ideas of “truth” and “cause”, even though they have done so according to different methodologies and from different points of view. Can those discussions stimulate theology, and if so, in what manner? In this paper, we begin by considering the subject of scientific change and rationality, arguing that scientific change leads to the recognition of the connection between any scientific theory and what remains intelligible in nature. Next, we show some of the outcomes from new mechanistic philosophy, focusing on the idea of cause, which unveils a strong correspondence between epistemology and ontology and provides a unique way of speaking about causality. Finally, we conclude that science can support theology through new approaches to nature and that a theology of science is required today as an intertwined perspective between science and theology. The main virtue that guides this approach is humility.

Funder

National Science Centre, Poland

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Religious studies

Reference67 articles.

1. Sosa, Ernest, and Tooley, Michael (1993). Causation, Oxford University Press. First published 1971.

2. Bazzi, P., Calcaterra, M., Centi, T. S., Odetto, E., and Pession, P. M. (1953). Quaestiones Disputatae, Marietti.

3. Spiazzi, Raimondo M. (1964). Aristotelis Libros Perì Hermeneias et Posteriorum Analyticorum Expositio, Marietti.

4. Pera, Ceslao, Marc, Pietro, and Caramello, Pietro (1967). Summa Contra Gentiles, Marietti.

5. Barnes, Jonathan (1976). Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, Clarendon Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3