Affiliation:
1. CNOOC Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 100028, China
2. Petroleum Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing) at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China
Abstract
Accurate well productivity prediction plays a significant role in formulating reservoir development plans. However, traditional well productivity prediction methods lack accuracy in tight gas reservoirs; therefore, this paper quantitatively evaluates the correlations between absolute open flow and the critical parameters for Linxing tight gas reservoirs through statistical analysis. Dominant control factors are obtained by considering reservoir engineering theories, and a novel machine learning-based well productivity prediction method is proposed for tight gas reservoirs. The adaptability of the productivity prediction model is assessed through machine learning and field data analysis. Combined with the typical decline curve analysis, the estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) of a single well in the tight gas reservoir is forecasted in an appropriate range. The results of the study include 10 parameters (such as gas saturation) identified as the dominant controlling factors for well productivity and geological factors that impact the productivity in this area compared to fracturing parameters. According to the prediction results of the three models, the R2 of Support Vector Regression (SVR), Back Propagation (BP), and Random Forest (RF) models are 0.72, 0.87, and 0.91, respectively. The results indicate that RF has a more accurate prediction. In addition, the RF model is more suitable for medium and high-production wells based on the actual field data. Based on this model, it is verified that the productivity of low-producing wells is affected by water production. This study confirms the model’s reliability and application value by predicting recoverable reserves for a single well.
Reference34 articles.
1. Motiur Rahman, M. (2008, January 28). Productivity Prediction for Fractured Wells in Tight Sand Gas Reservoirs Accounting for Non-Darcy Effects. Proceedings of the SPE Russian Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition, Moscow, Russia.
2. Wu, Y., Cheng, L., Huang, S., Fang, S., Killough, J.E., Jia, P., and Wang, S. (2019, January 22). A Transient Two-Phase Flow Model for Production Prediction of Tight Gas Wells with Fracturing Fluid-Induced Formation Damage. Proceedings of the SPE Western Regional Meeting, San Jose, CA, USA.
3. Aranguren, C., Fragoso, A., and Aguilera, R. (2022, January 20–22). Sequence-to-Sequence (Seq2Seq) Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) for Oil Production Forecast of Shale Reservoirs. Proceedings of the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.
4. Biswas, D. (2019, January 25). Adapting Shallow and Deep Learning Algorithms to Examine Production Performance—Data Analytics and Forecasting. Proceedings of the SPE/IATMI Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Bali, Indonesia.
5. Kocoglu, Y., Gorell, S., and McElroy, P. (2021, January 26–28). Application of Bayesian Optimized Deep Bi-LSTM Neural Networks for Production Forecasting of Gas Wells in Unconventional Shale Gas Reservoirs. Proceedings of the SPE/AAPG/SEG Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Houston, TX, USA.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献