Impact of Syndesmotic Screw Removal on Quality of Life, Mobility, and Daily Living Activities in Patients Post Distal Tibiofibular Diastasis Repair
Author:
Sanda Isabella-Ionela12, Hosin Samer13, Vermesan Dinu3, Deleanu Bogdan3, Pop Daniel3, Crisan Dan3, Al-Qatawneh Musab3, Mioc Mihai3ORCID, Prejbeanu Radu3, Rosca Ovidiu4
Affiliation:
1. Doctoral School, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania 2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania 3. Department of Orthopedics, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, 300041 Timisoara, Romania 4. Department of Infectious Diseases, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timisoara, Eftimie Murgu Square 2, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
Abstract
Background and Objectives: While numerous studies have been conducted on syndesmotic screw management following distal tibiofibular diastasis repair, a clear consensus remains unclear. This research aims to evaluate whether the postoperative removal of syndesmotic screws leads to improved patient outcomes, specifically in quality of life, mobility, and daily living activities, and whether it offers a cost-effective solution. Materials and Methods: Patients with a history of unimalleolar or bimalleolar ankle fractures, classified according to the Danis–Weber and Lauge–Hansen systems, were included. Comprehensive evaluations were made via standardized questionnaires like the SF-36 Health Survey, HADS, and WHOQOL-BREF, distributed approximately 2 months post surgery. A total of 93 patients underwent syndesmotic screw removal while 51 retained the screws (conservative approach). Results: Patients who underwent screw removal reported superior satisfaction in mobility, with a score of 7.8, compared to 6.7 in the conservative approach (p = 0.018). Similarly, their ability to perform daily activities scored 8.1, higher than the 6.5 from the conservative cohort (p < 0.001). Pain levels were also more favorable in the screw removal group, with a score of 5.3 against 6.8 in the conservative group (p = 0.003). On the SF-36 physical domain, the screw removal group achieved a mean score of 55.9 versus 53.3 for the conservative group (p = 0.027). Notably, the HADS anxiety subscale highlighted reduced anxiety levels in the screw removal cohort with a mean score of 5.8 against 7.3 in the conservative group (p = 0.006). However, overall quality of life and recommendations to others showed no significant difference between the groups. Conclusions: Syndesmotic screw removal postoperatively leads to marked improvements in patients’ mobility, daily activity abilities, and reduced postoperative pain and anxiety levels. However, overall quality of life was similar between the two approaches. The findings offer valuable insights for orthopedic decision making and patient-centered care concerning the management of syndesmotic screws after distal tibiofibular diastasis repair.
Reference38 articles.
1. Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis: Anatomy, Biomechanics, Injury and Management;Yuen;Open Orthop. J.,2017 2. Carto, C., Lezak, B., and Varacallo, M. (2023, August 08). Anatomy, Bony Pelvis and Lower Limb: Distal Tibiofibular Joint (Tibiofibular Syndesmosis), StatPearls [Internet], Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK547655/. 3. Acute syndesmotic injuries in ankle fractures: From diagnosis to treatment and current concepts;Pogliacomi;World J. Orthop.,2021 4. Syndesmosis injuries;Hunt;Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med.,2013 5. Evaluation and management of injuries of the tibiofibular syndesmosis;Magan;Br. Med. Bull.,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|