Growth Pattern of Hepatic Metastasis as a Prognostic Index Reflecting Liver Metastasis-Associated Survival in Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis

Abstract

Breast cancer with liver metastasis (BCLM) frequently cause hepatic failure owing to extensive liver metastasis compared to other cancers; however, there are no clinicopathologic or radiologic parameters for estimating BCLM prognosis. We analyzed the relationship between radiologic and clinicopathologic characteristics with survival outcomes in BCLM. During 2009–2019, baseline and final abdomen computed tomography or liver magnetic resonance imaging of BCLM patients were reviewed. Liver metastasis patterns were classified as oligometastasis (≤3 metastatic lesions), non-confluent or confluent mass formation, infiltration, and pseudocirrhosis. Thirty-one surgical or biopsy specimens for liver metastasis were immunostained for L1 adhesion molecule (L1CAM), Yes-associated protein 1/Transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (YAP/TAZ), and β1-integrin. Out of 156 patients, 77 initially had oligometastasis, 58 had nonconfluent mass formation, 14 had confluent mass formation, and 7 had infiltrative liver metastasis. Confluent or infiltrative liver metastasis showed inferior liver metastasis-associated survival (LMOS) compared to others (p = 0.001). Positive staining for L1CAM and YAP/TAZ was associated with inferior survival, and YAP/TAZ was related to final liver metastasis. Initial hepatic metastasis was associated with LMOS, especially confluent mass formation, and infiltrative liver metastasis pattern was associated with poor survival. Positive staining for YAP/TAZ and L1CAM was associated with inferior LMOS, and YAP/TAZ was related to final liver metastasis.