Integrating Pneumatic and Thermal Control in 3D Bioprinting for Improved Bio-Ink Handling
Author:
Woods Perrin1, Smith Carter2, Clark Scott2, Habib Ahasan1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA 2. Department of Sustainable Product Design and Architecture, Keene State College, Keene, NH 03431, USA
Abstract
The rapid advancement of 3D bioprinting has created a need for cost-effective and versatile 3D printers capable of handling bio-inks at various scales. This study introduces a novel framework for a specialized nozzle-holding device designed for an extrusion-based 3D bioprinter, specifically tailored to address the rigorous requirements of tissue engineering applications. The proposed system combines a pneumatically actuated plunger mechanism with an adaptive nozzle system, ensuring the safe inhibition and precise dispensing of bio-inks. Rigorous thermal management strategies are employed to maintain consistently low temperatures, thereby preserving bio-ink integrity without changing chemical stability. A key component of this design is a precision-milled aluminum block, which optimizes thermal characteristics while providing a protective barrier. Additionally, a 3D-printed extruder head bracket, fabricated using a high-precision resin printer, effectively mitigates potential thermal inconsistencies. The integration of these meticulously engineered components results in a modified extrusion-based 3D bioprinter with the potential to significantly advance tissue engineering methodologies. This study not only contributes to the advancement of bioprinting technology but also underscores the crucial role of innovative engineering in addressing tissue engineering challenges. The proposed bioprinter design lays a solid foundation for future research, aiming to develop more accurate, efficient, and reliable bioprinting solutions.
Funder
National Science Foundation National Institute of General Medical and Sciences of the NIH
Reference54 articles.
1. (2024, June 15). Available online: https://www.organdonor.gov/learn/organ-donation-statistics. 2. He, Y., Yang, F., Zhao, H., Gao, Q., Xia, B., and Fu, J. (2016). Research on the printability of hydrogels in 3D bioprinting. Sci. Rep., 6. 3. Engineering complex tissues;Atala;Sci. Transl. Med.,2012 4. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs;Murphy;Nat. Biotechnol.,2014 5. Pichler, R., Rizzo, L., Tröndle, K., Bühler, M., Brucker, H., Müller, A.-L., Grand, K., Farè, S., Viau, A., and Kaminski, M.M. (2022). Tuning the 3D microenvironment of reprogrammed tubule cells enhances biomimetic modeling of polycystic kidney disease. Biomaterials, 291.
|
|