Interlaboratory Comparison of SpermX™ and Conventional Differential Extractions Indicated High Male DNA Recovery by the SpermX Method

Author:

Sgueglia Joanne B.1,Holt Hailey1,Hanson Erin23,Nichols Justina45,Kalafut Tim6,Khan Mah-ro1,Walsh Thomas45,Foley Megan47,Brown Hiromi1,Ballantyne Jack23,Sinha Sudhir K.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. InnoGenomics Technologies, 2000 Lakeshore Dr #5016, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA

2. National Center for Forensic Science, P.O. Box 162367, Orlando, FL 32816, USA

3. Department of Chemistry, University of Central Florida, P.O. Box 162366, Orlando, FL 32816, USA

4. The Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, 2300 Stratford Ave, Willow Grove, PA 19090, USA

5. College of Life Sciences, Center City Campus, Thomas Jefferson University, 1020 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA

6. Department of Forensic Science, College of Criminal Justice, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, TX 77341, USA

7. Department of Forensic Sciences, The George Washington University, 2100 Foxhall Rd, Washington, DC 20007, USA

Abstract

The National Institute of Justice reported that current methods for processing sexual assault samples have a high failure rate, with 60 to 80 percent of tested kits unable to produce usable DNA profiles. Even when samples test positive for male DNA, 34 percent of sexual assault kits (SAKs) do not yield recovered male DNA after differential extraction. Less than 30% recovery of available sperm DNA contributes to this low success rate. The SpermX™ method (SX) has been shown to recover 80 percent or more of sperm DNA from sexual assault samples. An interlaboratory evaluation compared SX to standard differential extraction (DE) protocols. Mock samples with known ratios of female epithelial cells and sperm cells were processed using both methods. Results revealed that SX consistently provided CODIS up-loadable DNA profiles, even with as few as 25 sperm cells, whereas DE failed to produce usable results. On average, SX yielded a seven-fold increase in the recovery of unshared male alleles compared to DE. In conclusion, SX outperformed DE in recovering higher quantities of male DNA with minimal female carryover in sexual assault-type samples. This improved success rate in obtaining usable DNA profiles can significantly aid in solving sexual assault cases.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference22 articles.

1. National Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (2023, April 10). The National Sexual Assault Kit Initiative (SAKI). Available online: https://sakitta.org/metrics/.

2. Peterson, J., Johnson, D., Herz, D., Graziano, L., and Oehler, T. (2023, January 03). Sexual Assault Kit Backlog Study, NCJ Number 238500, Available online: https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/sexual-assault-kit-backlog-study.

3. David, K. (2023, April 26). Sexual Assault Kit Processing at the Alaska Scientific Crime Detection Laboratory-Letter- Public Information, Available online: https://dps.alaska.gov/getmedia/ac3e3f7d-6812-45d3-a730-29e0eeb9527c/April-2022-Sexual-Assault-Kit-Processing-Workflow.pdf.

4. Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’;Gill;Nature,1985

5. Evaluating the efficacy of DNA differential extraction methods for sexual assault evidence;Klein;Forensic. Sci. Int. Genet.,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3