Creating a Transnational Green Knowledge Commons for a Socially Just Sustainability Transition

Author:

Farley Joshua12ORCID,Walker Dakota12ORCID,Geffert Bryn3,Chandler Nina1,Eisel Lauren1,Friedberg Murray1,Portelli Dominic1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Community Development and Applied Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA

2. Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA

3. University of Vermont Dean of Libraries, Burlington, VT 05405, USA

Abstract

Humanity faces numerous deeply interconnected systemic risks to sustainability—a global polycrisis. We need economic institutions that produce the knowledge required to address this polycrisis at the lowest cost, maximize the benefits that knowledge generates, and distribute those benefits fairly. Knowledge improves through use; its value is maximized when it is freely available. Intellectual property rights (IPRs), a form of monopoly, direct knowledge production towards market goods, raise the cost of doing research, and reduce the benefits by price-rationing access. Building on theories of the commons, the anticommons, and market failures, we propose the creation of a transnational green knowledge commons (TGKC) in which all knowledge that contributes to solving the polycrisis be made open access on the condition that any subsequent improvements also be open access. We argue that a TGKC is more sustainable, just, and efficient than restrictive IPRs and well suited to the motivations and governance institutions of public universities. We show how a single university could initiate the process and estimate that the cost would be more than offset by reduced IPR expenses. A TGKC would reduce the costs of generating and disseminating knowledge directed towards a sustainable future and help stimulate the transnational cooperation, reciprocity, and trust required for sustainable management of the global biophysical commons.

Funder

University of Vermont and McGill University

SDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference129 articles.

1. Lawrence, M., Janzwood, S., and Homer-Dixon, T. (2024, July 23). What Is a Global Polycrisis? And How Is It Different from a Systemic Risk? Technical Paper #2022-4, Available online: https://cascadeinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/What-is-a-global-polycrisis-v2.pdf.

2. The President’s Materials Policy Commission (1952). Resources for Freedom: A Report to the President, Volume I: Foundations for Growth and Security.

3. Osborn, F. (1948). Our Plundered Planet, Little, Brown and Company.

4. Barnett, H., and Morse, C. (1963). Scarcity and Growth: The Economics of Natural Resource Availability, John Hopkins University Press.

5. Malthus, T.R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, Library of Economics and Liberty.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3