Analysis of Modern vs. Conventional Development Technologies in Transportation—The Case Study of a Last-Mile Delivery Process

Author:

Kostrzewski MariuszORCID,Abdelatty Yahya,Eliwa AhmedORCID,Nader MirosławORCID

Abstract

Transportation plays a significant role in the global economy and society and takes part in a lot of different processes such as mass transportation and the supply chain. Therefore, it is crucial to introduce modern technologies in this area of the economy in the context of Industry 4.0. The main scope of this study is to develop a model that supports analyzing last-mile logistics modern solutions using the latest technologies such as road autonomous delivery robots (RADRs), civil drones, or smart bikes, and compare them to conventional solutions (delivery vehicles). Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) was applied to build a formal comparison model that scores the solutions and weights different criteria according to decision-makers and placeholders, to rank the solutions from the most crucial option to the weakest in a predetermined scenario with set parameters and conditions (three varied scenarios were included in the present investigation). The results of the model were in favor of using civil drones or smart bicycles to perform light deliveries in small urban areas (these key findings support the assumptions that are often manifested in speech in the context of the use of new technologies). The modern solutions scored almost 40–80% higher in total in the conglomeration of assessment criteria (such as safety, economy, laws and regulations, operation time for the delivery, environment, and payload) than the conventional solution, which indicates the importance of studying the implementation of such technologies. An interesting result of the study is the operational cost reduction by ca. 60–74% in favor of autonomous delivery robots, 89–93% in favor of civil delivery drones, and 87–90% in favor of smart bikes vs. conventional delivery trucks/vans. Yet, it should be underlined that the results may vary with different assumptions within the MCDA method.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry

Reference121 articles.

1. Sarder, M.D. (2020). Logistics Transportation Systems, Elsevier. [1st ed.].

2. Kenton, W. (2022, February 26). Logistics Definition. Available online: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/logistics.asp.

3. (2022, February 26). Freight Transport Demand—European Environment Agency. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freight-transport-demandversion-2/assessment-7.

4. (2022, February 26). Freight Transport Demand—European Environment Agency, Version 2. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/freight-transport-demand-version-2/assessment-5.

5. (2022, July 18). Passenger and Freight Transport Demand in Europe. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/passenger-and-freight-transport-demand/assessment-1.

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3