Measurement Method Options to Investigate Digital Screen Technology Use by Children and Adolescents: A Narrative Review

Author:

Beynon Amber12ORCID,Hendry Danica12,Lund Rasmussen Charlotte12,Rohl Andrew L.13ORCID,Eynon Rebecca4,Thomas George15ORCID,Stearne Sarah12ORCID,Campbell Amity12,Harris Courtenay12,Zabatiero Juliana12,Straker Leon12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. ARC Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child, Australia

2. School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia

3. Curtin Institute for Data Science and School of Electrical Engineering, Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia

4. Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK

5. Health and Wellbeing Centre for Research Innovation, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia

Abstract

The role and potential impact of digital screen technology in the lives of children is heavily debated. Current evidence is limited by the weakness of measures typically used to characterise screen use, predominantly proxy- or self-reports with known inaccuracy and bias. However, robust and detailed evidence is needed to provide practical trustworthy guidance to families and professionals working with families. The purpose of this paper is to support researchers to select measurement method(s) that will provide robust and detailed evidence. The paper outlines the challenges in measuring contemporary screen use by children, using a child–technology interaction model to organise considerations. A range of different methods used to measure digital screen technology use in children and adolescents (i.e., questionnaires, diaries, electronically prompted sampling, direct observation, fixed room cameras, wearable/portable cameras, audio recorders, screen-device onboard logging, remote digital trace logging and proximity logging) are described along with examples of their use and constructs typically measured as well as a summary of the advantages and disadvantages of each method. A checklist and worked examples are provided to support researchers determining the best methods or combination of methods for a research project.

Funder

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for the Digital Child

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3