Accuracy Analysis of Digital Models from Intraoral Scanners and 3D-Printed Casts in Children and Teenagers

Author:

Serrano-Velasco Diego1,Martín-Vacas Andrea2ORCID,Giovannini Giovanni2,Paz-Cortés Marta Macarena2,Aragoneses Juan Manuel23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. PhD Program in Translational Medicine, Universidad San Pablo-CEU, CEU Universities, 28003 Madrid, Spain

2. Faculty of Dentistry, Alfonso X El Sabio University, 28691 Madrid, Spain

3. Department of Dental Research, Federico Henriquez y Carvajal University, Santo Domingo 10106, Dominican Republic

Abstract

Purpose: The aim was to analyze the accuracy of digital models and 3D-printed casts from full-arch digital impressions using two intraoral scanners (iTeroTM and PrimescanTM). Materials and methods: A crossover reliability study was designed, scanning children and teenagers with iTeroTM and PrimescanTM. Accuracy was evaluated by measuring intercanine, intermolar, and ipsilateral canine–molar distances intraorally and comparing these measurements with those from plaster casts, digital models obtained with intraoral scanners, and 3D-printed casts. A paired comparison and a general linear model with a one-way repeated measures ANOVA procedure were carried out with a confidence level of 95% (p ≤ 0.05). Results: A total of 51 subjects were analyzed (mean age 12.35 ± 2.57). Statistical differences (p < 0.05) were found in the upper and lower arch regarding accuracy in comparison to intraoral measurements, except for the iTeroTM-printed cast and canine–molar upper right and intercanine lower distances (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Regarding a comparison between reproduction methods, the plaster cast oversized the intercanine upper distance in comparison with both intraoral scanners’ digital models and the PrimescanTM-printed cast (p = 0.001), but there were no differences in the lower arch (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: Intraoral scanners reproduce tooth structures with similar accuracy to conventional methods.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference41 articles.

1. François, D. (1974). The Optical Impression, University Claude-Bernard.

2. Orthodontic scanners: What’s available?;Martin;J. Orthod.,2015

3. Intraoral scanning systems—A current overview;Zimmermann;Int. J. Comput. Dent.,2015

4. Digital Workflow for Indirect Bonding with 2D Lingual Brackets: A Case Report and Procedure Description;Rosti;Case Rep. Dent.,2019

5. Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions: Time and patient satisfaction;Burzynski;Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3