A Randomised Control Trial Investigating the Efficacy of the MapMe Intervention on Parental Ability to Correctly Categorise Overweight in Their Child and the Impact on Child BMI Z-Score Change at 1 Year

Author:

Jones Angela R.12ORCID,Mann Kay D.3,Cutler Laura R.12,Pearce Mark S.1,Tovée Martin J.4,Ells Louisa J.5,Araujo-Soares Vera6,Arnott Bronia1ORCID,Harris Julie M.7,Adamson Ashley J.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK

2. Human Nutrition and Exercise Research Centre, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK

3. Health Capital Division, Queensland Health, 33 Charlotte Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

4. Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK

5. School of Clinical & Applied Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK

6. Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, D-68167 Mannheim, Germany

7. School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TS, UK

Abstract

Research suggests parental ability to recognise when their child has overweight is limited. It is hypothesised that recognition of child overweight/obesity is fundamental to its prevention, acting as a potential barrier to parental action to improve their child’s health-related behaviours and/or help seeking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an intervention (MapMe) to improve parental ability to correctly categorise their child as having overweight one-month post-intervention, and reduce child body mass index (BMI) z-score 12 months post-intervention. MapMe consists of body image scales of known child BMI and information on the consequences of childhood overweight, associated health-related behaviours and sources of support. We conducted a three-arm (paper-based MapMe, web-based MapMe and control) randomised control trial in fifteen English local authority areas with parents/guardians of 4–5- and 10–11-year-old children. Parental categorisation of child weight status was assessed using the question ‘How would you describe your child’s weight at the moment?’ Response options were: underweight, healthy weight, overweight, and very overweight. Child weight status and BMI z-scores were calculated using objectively measured height and weight data and UK90 clinical thresholds. There was no difference in the percentage of parents correctly categorising their child as having overweight/very overweight (n = 264: 41% control, 48% web-based, and 43% paper-based, p = 0.646). BMI z-scores were significantly reduced for the intervention group at 12 months post-intervention compared to controls (n = 338, mean difference in BMI z-score change −0.11 (95% CI −0.202 to −0.020, p = 0.017). MapMe was associated with a decrease in BMI z-score 12 months post-intervention, although there was no direct evidence of improved parental ability to correctly categorise child overweight status. Further work is needed to replicate these findings in a larger sample of children, investigate mechanisms of action, and determine the use of MapMe as a public health initiative.

Funder

Prevention Research Initiative

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference36 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2017, March 17). Childhood Overweight and Obesity. Available online: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/childhood/en/.

2. World Health Organization (2017, March 17). Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/204176/1/9789241510066_eng.pdf?ua=1.

3. Parental underestimates of child weight: A meta-analysis;Lundahl;Pediatrics,2014

4. A systematic review of parental perception of overweight status in children;Parry;J. Ambul. Care Manag.,2008

5. Difference between parental perception and actual weight status of children: A systematic review;Paulis;Matern. Child Nutr.,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3