A Simulation Competition on Neonatal Resuscitation as a New Educational Tool for Pediatric Residents

Author:

Zanetto Lorenzo1ORCID,Cavallin Francesco2ORCID,Doglioni Nicoletta1,Bua Benedetta1,Savino Sandro3ORCID,Bernardo Giuseppe De4ORCID,Pratesi Simone5ORCID,Villani Paolo Ernesto6,Weiner Gary M.7,Trevisanuto Daniele1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University Hospital of Padua, Via Giustiniani, 3, 35128 Padua, Italy

2. Independent Statistician, 36020 Solagna, Italy

3. Department of Medicine–DIMED, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy

4. Department of Woman and Child, Ospedale Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli, 80122 Naples, Italy

5. Division of Neonatology, Careggi University Hospital of Florence, 50141 Florence, Italy

6. Health Women Department, Poliambulanza Foundation, 25124 Brescia, Italy

7. Department of Pediatrics-Neonatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA

Abstract

Background: Training programs on resuscitation have been developed using simulation-based learning to build skills, strengthen cognitive strategies, and improve team performance. This is especially important for residency programs where reduced working hours and high numbers of residents can reduce the educational opportunities during the residency, with lower exposure to practical procedures and prolonged length of training. Within this context, gamification has gained popularity in teaching and learning activities. This report describes the implementation of a competition format in the context of newborn resuscitation and participants’ perceptions of the educational experience. Methods: Thirty-one teams of three Italian pediatric residents participated in a 3-day simulation competition on neonatal resuscitation. The event included an introductory lecture, familiarization time, and competition time in a tournament-like structure using high-fidelity simulation stations. Each match was evaluated by experts in neonatal resuscitation and followed by a debriefing. The scenarios and debriefings of simulation station #1 were live broadcasted in the central auditorium where teams not currently competing could observe. At the end of the event, participants received an online survey regarding their perceptions of the educational experience. Results: 81/93 (87%) participants completed the survey. Training before the event mostly included reviewing protocols and textbooks. Low-fidelity manikins were the most available simulation tools at the residency programs. Overall, the participants were satisfied with the event and appreciated the live broadcast of scenarios and debriefings in the auditorium. Most participants felt that the event improved their knowledge and self-confidence and stimulated them to be more involved in high-fidelity simulations. Suggested areas of improvement included more time for familiarization and improved communication between judges and participants during the debriefing. Conclusions: Participants appreciated the simulation competition. They self-perceived the educational impact of the event and felt that it improved their knowledge and self-confidence. Our findings suggest areas of improvements for further editions and may serve as an educational model for other institutions.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference28 articles.

1. American Academy of Pediatrics (2021). Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation (NRP), American Academy of Pediatrics. [8th ed.].

2. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth;Madar;Resuscitation,2021

3. Using briefing, simulation and debriefing to improve human and system performance;Halamek;Semin. Perinatol.,2019

4. Using simulation to instruct emergency medicine residents in cognitive forcing strategies;Bond;Acad. Med.,2004

5. Simulation-based education for building clinical teams;Marshall;J. Emerg. Trauma Shock.,2010

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3