Author:
Huh Da-An,Lim Hong,Sohn Jong-Ryeul,Byeon Sang-Hoon,Jung Soonyoung,Lee Woo-Kyun,Moon Kyong
Abstract
For efficient management of chemicals, it is necessary to preferentially select hazardous chemicals as being high-priority through a screening method. Over the past 20 years, chemical ranking and scoring (CRS) methods have been applied in many countries; however, these CRS methods have a few limitations. Most of the existing methods only use some of the variables to calculate the hazard of chemicals or use the most conservative score without consideration of the correlation between chemical toxicities. This evaluation could underestimate or overestimate the real health hazard of the chemicals. To overcome the limitations of these methods, we developed a new CRS method using the Mahalanobis–Taguchi System (MTS). The MTS, which conducts multivariate analysis, produced chemical rankings that took into accounts the correlation between variables related to chemical health hazards. Also, the proportion of chemicals managed by the Korea Chemicals Control Act that were given a high rating appeared to be higher when the MTS was used, compared to the existing methods. These results indicated that the new method evaluated the health hazards of chemicals more accurately, and we expect that the MTS method could be applied to a greater range of chemicals than the existing CRS methods.
Subject
Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference28 articles.
1. Strengthen the Prevention of Occupational Diseases,2012
2. Comparative Evaluation of Chemical Ranking and Scoring Methodologies;Davis,1994
3. A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts
4. A Study on the Priority for the Hazard and Risk Evaluation of Chemicals (HREC) According to the Industrial Safety and Health Act (ISHA);Yang;J. Korean Soc. Occup. Environ. Hyg.,2012
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献