The Influence of Changing Socioeconomic Conditions in Europe on the Prioritisation of Risks in Travel Behaviour: A Case Study
-
Published:2023-12-03
Issue:23
Volume:15
Page:16518
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Dudzińska Małgorzata1ORCID, Gross Marta1ORCID, Dawidowicz Agnieszka1ORCID, Wolny-Kucińska Ada1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Land Management and Geographic Information Systems, Faculty of Geoengineering, Institute of Spatial Management and Geography, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Oczapowskiego 2 Street, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
Abstract
Pandemics, political instability, social conflict and unrest, the economic crisis resulting from changes in energy supply contracts, terrorism, and civil and international wars exert a negative impact on the lives of millions of people. These events undermine economic and social stability, and they affect travel behaviour (TB). Understanding preferences in travel behaviour is essential for designing effective and sustainable transport systems. Agenda 2030 (the global sustainable development strategy) assigns a central role to mobility and transport in sustainable development and its components: economic, social, and environmental. Relevant research is scarce, which is why potential threats, including changes in socioeconomic factors that affect TB in functional urban areas (FUAs), should be identified and prioritised. The main aim of this study was to determine changes in the prioritisation of threats to TB resulting from the socioeconomic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy crisis in Europe. The study involved an analysis of the literature, a comprehensive classification of potential threats that could impact TB, as well as an expert survey. The results of these analyses were used to develop a list of 46 factors that were grouped into six categories of key threats: social, economic, legal, infrastructural, technological/SMART, and environmental. The level of significance, similarities, and differences in the prioritisation of threats during the COVID-19 pandemic and the energy crisis after the outbreak of the military conflict in Ukraine (duration and range) were compared across 22 European countries.
Funder
National Science Center
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference134 articles.
1. Rindone, C. (2022). Sustainable Mobility as a Service: Supply Analysis and Test Cases. Information, 13. 2. Russo, F. (2022). Sustainable Mobility as a Service: Dynamic Models for Agenda 2030 Policies. Information, 13. 3. Chapter One—The Roots of Racialized Travel Behavior;Pereira;Advances in Transport Policy and Planning,2021 4. Davis, A.W., Polydoropoulou, A., Stathopoulos, A., Farooq, B., Bhat, C.R., Antoniou, C., Zhang, J., Goulias, K.G., Mohammadian, K., and Kamargianni, M. (2019). Mapping the Travel Behavior Genome, Elsevier. 5. Rodrigue, J.-P. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems, Routledge. [5th ed.].
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|