Implementation of Urban Solution for New Faculty Facilities within Spatial Historical and Cultural Units—A Case Study of Belgrade, Serbia
-
Published:2023-03-22
Issue:6
Volume:15
Page:5590
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Danilović Hristić Nataša1ORCID, Lalošević Marija2ORCID, Stefanović Nebojša1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Architecture and Urban & Spatial Planning of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2. Institute of Urban Planning of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
Abstract
The focus of this study is buildings for public purposes, specifically for higher education, planned in zones of spatial cultural-historical units. Sustainable urban planning in areas with cultural-historical heritage is a particular challenge since the higher education facilities themselves have their own functional requirements, which are much easier to fulfill in “softer” locations. The research objective is to prove the hypothesis that it is possible to indicate a prescription for the practical application of the theoretical model and define the necessary steps to achieve the best sustainable quality results in practice. The paper analyses the associated process, relational settings, circumstances, participants, and timelines, and it presents the results of final designs based on two parallel case studies of new capital buildings for the University of Belgrade. Methodologically it gives an overview of the context, referring to other research and examples, detailing chosen case studies, and describing their backgrounds, conditions and requirements, frameworks, chronologies, approaches, and results. The discussion concludes with theoretical models originating from the comparison of implemented steps in the process of creation and evaluation of architectural ideas and summarized similarities and differences, aiming that there is a common model suitable for further applications. The practical result of the research is findings about the pathway for the best original planning solution emphasized through the institution of urban architectural competitions as a mandatory step, recommending wider participation of experts in the process of evaluation.
Funder
Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference64 articles.
1. Law on Planning and Construction. Standard No. No. 72/2009, 81/2009, 64/2010—Decision US, 24/2011, 121/2012, 42/2013—Decision US, 50/2013—Decision US, 98/2013—Decision US, 132/2014, 145/2014, 83/2018, 31/2019, 37/2019—other laws, 9/2020 and 52/2021. (In Serbian). 2. Thomas, A.G. (1991). The Campus as a Work of Art, Praeger Publishers. 3. Dober, R. (1996). Campus Planning, Society for College and University Planning. 4. Coulson, J., Roberts, P., and Taylor, I. (2015). University Planning and Architecture: The Search for Perfection, Routledge. 5. Coulson, J., Roberts, P., and Taylor, I. (2015). University Trends—Contemporary Campus Design, Routledge.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|