Abstract
In this paper electoral disproportionality is split into two types: (1) Forced or unavoidable, due to the very nature of the apportionment problem; and (2) non-forced. While disproportionality indexes proposed in the literature do not distinguish between such components, we design an index, called “quota index”, just measuring avoidable disproportionality. Unlike the previous indexes, the new one can be zero in real situations. Furthermore, this index presents an interesting interpretation concerning transfers of seats. Properties of the quota index and relationships with some usual disproportionality indexes are analyzed. Finally, an empirical approach is undertaken for different countries and elections.
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Development
Reference15 articles.
1. Parametric methods of apportionment, rounding and production
2. Fair Representation: Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote;Balinski,2001
3. Comparison of indices of disproportionality in PR systems;Bolun;Computer Science Journal of Moldova,2012
4. Selecting Indexes of Electoral Proportionality: General Properties and Relationships
5. Axiomatic Characterization of Some Disproportionality and Malapportionment Indiceshttps://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=SCW2016&paper_id=287
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献