Your Favourite Park Is Not My Favourite Park: A Participatory Geographic Information System Approach to Improving Urban Green and Blue Spaces—A Case Study in Edinburgh, Scotland

Author:

Wendelboe-Nelson Charlotte1ORCID,Wang Yiyun1,Bell Simon12ORCID,McDougall Craig W.3,Ward Thompson Catharine1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. OPENspace Research Centre, Edinburgh School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, Edinburgh College of Art, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, UK

2. Department of Landscape Architecture, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 51006 Tartu, Estonia

3. Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, School of Health in Social Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH1 2QL, UK

Abstract

Access to urban green and blue spaces (UGBSs) has been associated with positive effects on health and wellbeing; however, the past decades have seen a decline in quality and user satisfaction with UGBSs. This reflects the mounting challenges that many UK cities face in providing appropriate public facilities, alongside issues such as health inequalities, an ageing population, climate change, and loss of biodiversity. At present, little is known about the preferences of different population subgroups and, specifically, the UGBSs they visit and the spaces they avoid. Using a public participatory geographic information system (PPGIS), the overall aim of the research presented here was to investigate the preferences of different population subgroups in urban areas, and the UGBSs they visit, using Edinburgh, Scotland as a case study. We created a baseline visitor demographic profile for UGBS use, and highlighted how visitors perceive, physically access, use, and engage with UGBSs. The results revealed considerable variation in UGBS preference: one person’s favourite UGBS may be one that someone else dislikes and avoids. It is clear that adapting UGBSs to suit local communities should not be a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach. The conflicting views and preferences of different groups of respondents point to the importance of developing policies and park management plans that can accommodate a variety of uses and experiential qualities within individual parks. PPGIS approaches, such as those utilised in this study, offer opportunities to address this issue and provide evidence to increase equitable UGBS usage.

Funder

City of Edinburgh Council

The Heritage Lottery Fund

United Kingdom Prevention Research Partnership

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference50 articles.

1. HM Government UK (2024, March 12). Levelling up the United Kingdom Executive Summary, Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1095544/Executive_Summary.pdf.

2. (2024, March 12). Who Benefits from Nature in Cities? Social Inequalities in Access to Urban Green and Blue Spaces Across Europe—European Environment Agency. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/who-benefits-from-nature-in.

3. Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe—A critical review and appraisal of 27 studies;Wittchen;Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol.,2005

4. Sociodemographic and Psychological Risk Factors for Anxiety and Depression: Findings from the COVID-19 Health and Adherence Research in Scotland on Mental Health (CHARIS-MH) Cross-sectional Survey;Hubbard;Int. J. Behav. Med.,2021

5. Hubbard, G., Den Daas, C., Johnston, M., Murchie, P., Thompson, C.W., and Dixon, D. (2021). Are rurality, area deprivation, access to outside space, and green space associated with mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic? A cross sectional study (charis-e). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3