Assessment of Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) Welfare in the Semi-Intensive and Intensive Culture Systems in Thailand

Author:

Lertwanakarn Tuchakorn1ORCID,Purimayata Thitima23,Luengyosluechakul Thnapol2,Grimalt Pau Badia4,Pedrazzani Ana Silvia5,Quintiliano Murilo Henrique6ORCID,Surachetpong Win3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Veterinary Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

2. Graduate Program in Animal Health and Biomedical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

3. Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand

4. FAI Registered Office Company Address, The Barn, Wytham, Oxford OX2 8QJ, UK

5. Wai Ora Aquaculture and Environmental Technology Ltd., Curitiba 80240-050, Brazil

6. FAI Farms, Londrina 86115-000, Brazil

Abstract

Welfare assessments have risen to prominence in the aquaculture industry, with increasing awareness of their significance among stakeholders in Thailand. In this study, we conducted a welfare assessment of tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) farms in Thailand, focusing on health, environmental, behavioural, and nutritional indicators. Comparing semi-intensive (earthen ponds) and intensive farming practices (cage culture), we found significant differences in the overall health score, particularly at farm F due to a disease outbreak (Kruskal–Wallis, p = 0.01). Skin and fin scores varied across farms, indicating their potential as indicators of tilapia health. Environmental assessments revealed differences in transparency between the two culturing systems (Mann–Whitney, p = 0.02). During the harvesting process, tilapia behaviours indicated poor welfare across all farms. However, no statistically significant difference in overall welfare scores was found between the two culturing systems. Correlations were observed between nutritional, environmental, and health indicators, with negative correlations between fish density and water transparency (r = −0.87, p = 0.02), presence of inhabitants (r = −0.78, p = 0.04), feeding behaviours (r = −0.78, p = 0.04), and swimming behaviours during capture (r = −0.98, p = 0.001). These findings provide valuable insights to enhance tilapia-farming practices and welfare in Thailand.

Funder

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council, the Office of the Prime Minister, through Kasetsart University

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology

Reference45 articles.

1. Food and Agricultural Organization (2022). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022, FAO. Towards Blue Transformation.

2. Noorit, K. (2023, July 20). Situation of Tilapia and Their Products in 2021 and Trends in 2022 of Thailand. Available online: https://www.fisheries.go.th/strategy/fisheconomic/Monthly%20report/tilapia/3.situation%20of%20tilapia%20Q4%2064.pdf.

3. Mellor, D.J., Beausoleil, N.J., Littlewood, K.E., McLean, A.N., McGreevy, P.D., Jones, B., and Wilkins, C. (2020). The 2020 five domains model: Including human–animal interactions in assessments of animal welfare. Animals, 10.

4. (2023, July 20). Guidance on the Application on the Application of Thai Agricultural Standard: Good Aquaculture Practices for Food-Aquatic Animals Farm. Available online: https://www.fisheries.go.th/local/file_document/20220531115826_1_file.pdf.

5. (2023, June 16). Aquaculture Stewardship Council (ASC) Variance Request Procedure Version 2.0. Available online: https://www.asc-aqua.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ASC-Standards-related-variance-request-procedure-v1.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3