Affiliation:
1. Military Nutrition Division, US Army Research, Institute of Environmental Medicine, 10 General Greene Ave., Natick, MA 01760, USA
2. Deployment Health Research Department, Naval Health Research Center, Building 329 Ryne Rd., San Diego, CA 92152, USA
3. Defense Centers for Public Health–Aberdeen, 8252 Blackhawk Rd., Aberdeen Proving Ground, Gunpowder, MD 21010, USA
Abstract
Previous studies investigating temporal changes in dietary supplement (DS) use have used representative samples but have not followed the same cohort over time. This study investigated longitudinal patterns of changes in DS use and factors associated with discontinuing DS use in a single group of active-duty United States military service members (SMs). SMs (n = 5778) completed two identical questionnaires on their DS use and demographic/lifestyle characteristics an average ± standard deviation 1.3 ± 0.2 years apart. Prevalences of reported DS use ≥1 times/week in the baseline (BL) and follow-up (FU) phases were: any DS, BL = 77%, FU = 78%; multivitamins/multiminerals (MVM), BL = 50%, FU = 48%; individual vitamins/minerals, BL = 33%, FU 35%; proteins/amino acids, BL = 43%, FU = 39%; combination products, BL = 44%, FU = 37%; prohormones, BL = 5%, FU = 4%; herbal products, BL = 23%, FU = 21%; joint health products, BL = 12%, FU = 12%; fish oils, BL = 25%, FU = 23%; other DSs, BL = 17%, FU = 17%. Among BL users, the proportions reporting use in the FU phase were: any DS 88%, MVM 74%, protein/amino acids 70%, individual vitamin/minerals 62%, combination products 62%, fish oils 61%, joint health products 57%, herbal products 50%, other DSs 50%, and prohormones 37%. Higher odds of discontinuing any DS use in the follow-up were associated with female gender, younger age, higher BMI, and less weekly resistance training. Overall, prevalence of DS use was relatively consistent in the two phases; however, the cohort changed their use patterns in the follow-up with some discontinuing use and others initiating use, thus maintaining use prevalence over the period. These findings have implications for repeated cross-sectional DS studies where different samples are followed over time.
Funder
Department of Defense Center Alliance for Nutrition and Dietary Supplement Research
US Army Medical Research and Development Command
Reference55 articles.
1. Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (2020, July 14). Public Law 103-417, 103rd Congress, Available online: https://ods.od.nih.gov/About/dshea_Wording.aspx.
2. The dietary supplement marketplace. Constantly evolving;Saldanha;Nutr. Today,2007
3. (2023, March 12). Supplement Market More than $5B Higher than Pre-Pandemic Expectations, according to Nutrition Business Journal’s 2022 Supplement Business Report. Available online: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/supplement-market-more-than-5b-higher-than-pre-pandemic-expectations-according-to-nutrition-business-journals-2022-supplement-business-report-301563200.html.
4. (2023, March 12). Dietary Supplement Market Size Report, 2022–2023. Available online: https://www.naturalproductsinsider.com/business-operations/supplement-business-forecast-special-report.
5. Vitamin supplement use, by demographic characteristics;Block;Am. J. Epidemiol.,1988