Response of the Anchoring Performance at Betula platyphylla’s Root–Soil Interface to Cyclic Loading

Abstract

In dealing with issues such as soil erosion and slope instability, plant roots enhance the shear strength of the soil mass through their anchoring effect. However, in nature, cyclic loads such as flash floods and blizzards indirectly impose fatigue effects on plant root systems. To explore the impact of cyclic loads on the anchoring capacity of plant roots, this paper selects the roots of Betula platyphylla as the research object and uses a monotonic load and cyclic load as two loading modes. Under different loading amplitudes (25%, 50%, and 75%), root diameters and burial depths (50 mm, 100 mm, and 150 mm), and soil moisture contents (11.85%, 13.85%, and 15.85%), the effects of each factor on the anchoring capacity of the roots under cyclic loading are analyzed. The results showed that the root–soil interface exhibited two failure modes under different cyclic load amplitudes, and the cyclic load significantly reduced the maximum friction of the root–soil interface. As the cyclic load amplitude increased (from 25% to 75%), the hysteretic curve envelope area increased, and the growth rate of cumulative residual slip changed from decreasing to decreasing and then increasing. A good correlation was found between cumulative residual slip and the number of loading cycles, and the three characteristic slips were correlated with loading amplitude but not significantly with diameter. The increase in soil moisture content, root embedment depth, and diameter led to an increase in the ratio of the two maximum friction forces. It was shown that a certain degree of plasticity exists at the root–soil interface to resist environmental stresses in nature. At high fatigue stress levels, the root–soil interface is more nonlinear, and as the load amplitude increases, more energy is dissipated, and bond damage between the root–soil interface becomes more pronounced. The root–soil interface gradually degraded under long-term cyclic loading, whereas the increase in root depth and soil water content could resist the negative effect of cyclic loading on anchorage capacity, and the resistance effect became more and more obvious with the increase in diameter.