Physics Forceps in Tooth Extraction—A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Janani KrishnamachariORCID,Teja Kavalipurapu VenkataORCID,Alam Mohammad Khursheed,Nagy Ahmed IsmailORCID,Basheer Sulphi Abdul,Srivastava Kumar ChandanORCID,Hosni Hala A.,Jose JerryORCID,Shrivastava DeeptiORCID

Abstract

The present systematic review aims to evaluate the efficiency of Physics forceps over the conventional forceps for the extraction of a tooth. The study began with targeted electronic searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases. All selected articles were reviewed by four independent reviewers for eligibility. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to analyze the studies for bias. Due to heterogeneity of the selected studies, a meta-analysis of the current systematic review was not possible. A total of five studies were considered for the final analysis. The risk of bias showed high risk for all five included articles. Various parameters, such as fracture of the root, dry socket, healing, pain, postoperative infection, crown fractures, buccal bone fractures, extraction time, gingival and marginal bone loss, gingival laceration, bleeding and healing were assessed. Based on the data available, there is an insufficient quality of evidence to conclude the superiority of the Physics forceps over conventional forceps.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes,Computer Science Applications,Process Chemistry and Technology,General Engineering,Instrumentation,General Materials Science

Reference19 articles.

1. Predictable, atraumatic dental extractions;Feck;Dent. Econ.,2010

2. Rationale for Socket Preservation after Extraction of a Single-Rooted Tooth when Planning for Future Implant Placement;Irinakis;J. Can. Dent. Assoc.,2006

3. Immediate Placement and Provisionalization of Implant-Supported, Single-Tooth Restorations: A Retrospective Study

4. Beak and bumper – Physics forceps: Evaluation of new technique in extraction

5. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement;Moher;PLoS Med.,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3