Comparative Assessment of Five Machine Learning Algorithms for Supervised Object-Based Classification of Submerged Seagrass Beds Using High-Resolution UAS Imagery

Author:

Thomasberger Aris1ORCID,Nielsen Mette Møller1,Flindt Mogens Rene2,Pawar Satish1,Svane Niels2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section for Coastal Ecology, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark

2. Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Knowledge about the spatial distribution of seagrasses is essential for coastal conservation efforts. Imagery obtained from unoccupied aerial systems (UAS) has the potential to provide such knowledge. Classifier choice and hyperparameter settings are, however, often based on time-consuming trial-and-error procedures. The presented study has therefore investigated the performance of five machine learning algorithms, i.e., Bayes, Decision Trees (DT), Random Trees (RT), k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) when used for the object-based classification of submerged seagrasses from UAS-derived imagery. The influence of hyperparameter tuning and training sample size on the classification accuracy was tested on images obtained from different altitudes during different environmental conditions. The Bayes classifier performed well (94% OA) on images obtained during favorable environmental conditions. The DT and RT classifier performed better on low-altitude images (93% and 94% OA, respectively). The kNN classifier was outperformed on all occasions, while still producing OA between 89% and 95% in five out of eight scenarios. The SVM classifier was most sensitive to hyperparameter tuning with OAs ranging between 18% and 97%; however, it achieved the highest OAs most often. The findings of this study will help to choose the appropriate classifier and optimize related hyperparameter settings.

Funder

European Maritime and Fisheries Fund and the Danish Fisheries Agency

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3