Analytical Validation of an Immunohistochemical 7-Biomarker Prognostic Assay (immunoprint®) for Early-Stage Cutaneous Melanoma in Archival Tissue of Patients with AJCC v8 T2–T3 Disease

Author:

Ziemer Mirjana1ORCID,Weidenthaler-Barth Beate2ORCID,Gussek Philipp1,Pfeiffer Maja2,Kleemann Johannes3ORCID,Bankov Katrin4ORCID,Wild Peter J.45ORCID,Seibold Silke6,Sureshkumar Priyavathi6,Nickel Patricia6,Strobel Anton6,Werner Markus6,Grabbe Stephan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, University Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany

2. Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany

3. Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

4. Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

5. Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

6. Synvie GmbH, 80992 Munich, Germany

Abstract

Selected patients with early-stage melanoma have a “hidden high risk” of poor oncologic outcomes. They might benefit from clinical trials, and ultimately, if warranted by trial results, judicious everyday use of adjuvant therapy. A promising tool to identify these individuals is the immunoprint® assay. This immunohistochemical 7-biomarker prognostic test was clinically validated in three independent cohorts (N = 762) to classify early-stage patients as high-risk or low-risk regarding melanoma recurrence and mortality. Using College of American Pathologists (CAP) recommendations, we analytically validated this assay in primary melanoma specimens (N = 20 patients). We assessed assay precision by determining consistency of risk classification under repeated identical conditions (repeatability) or across varying conditions (reproducibility), involving separate assay runs, operators (laboratory scientists), and/or observers (e.g., dermatopathologists). Reference classification was followed by five analytical validation phases: intra-run/intra-operator, intra-observer, inter-run, inter-operator, and inter-observer. Concordance of classifications in each phase was assessed via Fleiss’ kappa (primary endpoint) and percent agreement (secondary endpoint). Seven-marker signature classification demonstrated high consistency across validation categories (Fleiss’ kappa 0.864–1.000; overall percent agreement 95–100%), in 9/10 cases, exceeding, and in 1/10 cases, closely approaching, CAP’s recommended 0.9 level. The 7-marker assay has now been verified to provide excellent repeatability, reproducibility, and precision, besides having been clinically validated.

Funder

Synvie GmbH

NeraCare GmbH

Staburo GmbH

Spencer-Fontayne Corporation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Clinical Biochemistry

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3