Affiliation:
1. Department of Health, Exercise and Rehabilitative Sciences, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA
2. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Winona State University, Winona, MN 55987, USA
Abstract
Hydrostatic weighing (HW) requires full submersion with the lungs at residual volume (RV) which is uncomfortable. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to find a more comfortable way to complete HW. A HW system was used to complete three comparisons: comparison 1: change in head position (head above water vs. head below water (HAW vs. HBW)), comparison 2: change in lung volume (total lung capacity (TLC) vs. RV), and comparison 3: change in head and lung volume changes. Participants were separated by males (n = 64) and females (n = 58). Comparison 1: HAW resulted in higher mean percent body fat (PBF) than HBW (4.5% overall, 3.8% in males, 5.4% in females, p < 0.05). Comparison 2: TLC resulted in lower mean PBF than RV (5.1% overall, 5.3% in males, 4.8% in females, p < 0.05). Comparison 3: HAW@TLC resulted in significantly lower (1.5% lower, p = 0.003) mean PBF for males but was not significantly lower for females or overall (0.6% higher, p = 0.39, 0.6% lower, p = 0.18, respectively) compared to HBW@RV. In conclusion, keeping the head above water and taking a deep inhale makes HW a more enjoyable, and accessible experience for everyone while still producing accurate PBF results.
Reference26 articles.
1. Liguori, G., Feito, Y., Fountaine, C., and Roy, B. (2022). ACSM’s Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription, Wolters Kluwer.
2. Body composition techniques;Kuriyan;Indian. J. Med. Res.,2018
3. Heyward, V.H., and Wagner, D.R. (2004). Applied Body Composition Assessment, Human Kinetics. [2nd ed.].
4. Advanced body composition assessment: From body mass index to body composition profiling;Borga;J. Investig. Med.,2018
5. Hydrostatic weighing at residual volume and functional residual capacity;Thomas;J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol.,1980