An Analysis of Blockchain-Based IoT Sensor Network Distributed Denial of Service Attacks
Author:
Arachchige Kithmini Godewatte1, Branch Philip1ORCID, But Jason1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Telecommunications, Electrical, Robotics and Biomedical Engineering, Swinburne University, Melbourne 3122, Australia
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) and blockchain are emerging technologies that have attracted attention in many industries, including healthcare, automotive, and supply chain. IoT networks and devices are typically low-powered and susceptible to cyber intrusions. However, blockchains hold considerable potential for securing low-power IoT networks. Blockchain networks provide security features such as encryption, decentralisation, time stamps, and ledger functions. The integration of blockchain and IoT technologies may address many of the security concerns. However, integrating blockchain with IoT raises several issues, including the security vulnerabilities and anomalies of blockchain-based IoT networks. In this paper, we report on our experiments using our blockchain test bed to demonstrate that blockchains on IoT platforms are vulnerable to DDoS attacks, which can also potentially lead to device hardware failures. We show that a number of anomalies are visible during either a DDoS attack or IoT device failure. In particular, the temperature of IoT hardware devices can exceed 90 °C during a DDoS attack, which could lead to hardware failure and potential fire hazards. We also found that the Block Transaction Rate (BTR) and network block loss percentage can increase due to corrupted hardware, with the BTR dropping to nearly zero blocks/sec and a block loss percentage of over 50 percent for all evaluated blockchains, and as high as 81.3 percent in one case. Our experiments demonstrate that anomalous temperature, latency, bandwidth, BTR, and network block loss percentage can potentially be used to identify DDoS attacks.
Reference55 articles.
1. Vinko, D., Milicevic, K., Lukic, I., and Kohler, M. (2023). Microcontroller-Based PUF for Identity Authentication and Tamper Resistance of Blockchain-Compliant IoT Devices. Sensors, 23. 2. Thanalakshmi, P., Rishikhesh, A., Marion Marceline, J., Joshi, G.P., and Cho, W. (2023). A Quantum-Resistant Blockchain System: A Comparative Analysis. Mathematics, 11. 3. Suyatna, I.P., Mohamed, Y.H., Abbas, M.S., Ismail, A.F., Magiman, M.M., and Yunus, Y. (2023, January 12–13). The Emergence and Challenges of Blockchain Technology in Business and IoT Applications. Proceedings of the 2023 3rd International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE), Greater Noida, India. 4. Pancari, S., Rashid, A., Zheng, J., Patel, S., Wang, Y., and Fu, J. (2023). A Systematic Comparison between the Ethereum and Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain Platforms for Attribute-Based Access Control in Smart Home IoT Environments. Sensors, 23. 5. Naqash, M.T., Syed, T.A., Alqahtani, S.S., Siddiqui, M.S., Alzahrani, A., and Nauman, M. (2023). A Blockchain Based Framework for Efficient Water Management and Leakage Detection in Urban Areas. Urban Sci., 7.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|