Affiliation:
1. Chair of Ergonomics and Innovation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chemnitz University of Technology, 09111 Chemnitz, Germany
2. YOUSE GmbH, 13187 Berlin, Germany
Abstract
The rapidly growing research on the accessibility of digital technologies has focused on blind or visually impaired (BVI) users. However, the field of human–robot interaction has largely neglected the needs of BVI users despite the increasing integration of assistive robots into daily life and their potential benefits for our aging societies. One basic robotic capability is object handover. Robots assisting BVI users should be able to coordinate handovers without eye contact. This study gathered insights on the usability of human–robot handovers, including 20 BVI and 20 sighted participants. In a standardized experiment with a mixed design, a handover robot prototype equipped with a voice user interface and haptic feedback was evaluated. The robot handed over everyday objects (i) by placing them on a table and (ii) by allowing for midair grasping. The usability target was met, and all user groups reported a positive user experience. In total, 97.3% of all handovers were successful. The qualitative feedback showed an appreciation for the clear communication of the robot’s actions and the handover reliability. However, the duration of the handover was seen as a critical issue. According to all subjective criteria, the BVI participants showed higher variances compared to the sighted participants. Design recommendations for improving robotic handovers equally supporting both user groups are given.
Funder
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Chemnitz University of Technology
Reference45 articles.
1. IAPB (2023, December 11). International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness’s Vision Atlas. Available online: https://www.iapb.org/learn/vision-atlas/magnitude-and-projections/.
2. An insight into assistive technology for the visually impaired and blind people: State-of-the-art and future trends;Bhowmick;J. Multimodal User Interfaces,2017
3. Kitamura, Y., Quigley, A., Isbister, K., Igarashi, T., Bjørn, P., and Drucker, S. (2021, January 8–13). What Do We Mean by “Accessibility Research”?. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan.
4. Findings from a Qualitative Field Study with an Autonomous Robot in Public: Exploration of User Reactions and Conflicts;Babel;Int. J. Soc. Robot.,2022
5. Bicchi, A., and Burgard, W. (2018). Robotics Research, Springer International Publishing. Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics.