Contested Welfare: Migrant Organizations in Search of Their Role in the German Welfare State

Author:

Günzel Eva1,Kellmer Ariana2,Klammer Ute2,Schlee Thorsten2

Affiliation:

1. Urban and Regional Studies, Faculty of Social Science, Ruhr-University Bochum, 44801 Bochum, Germany

2. Institute for Work, Skills and Training, University of Duisburg-Essen, 47057 Duisburg, Germany

Abstract

This article examines the role of migrant organizations (MOs) in the welfare state and reflects on the transformation and negotiation processes in the organization of social protection in a society that is increasingly characterized by various forms of cross-border mobility. The article first describes various transformation trends in German social policy by highlighting the activation policy and marketization of social services. This transformation concerns not only the formal (material) forms of social protection and the relationship between migration and social policy, but also the organization of social protection within the German welfare state. By analysing qualitative interviews with representatives of migrant organizations and welfare associations, we then show which roles are ascribed to MOs by other welfare actors in the context of social protection and how the MOs position themselves. We argue that these role ascriptions are part of a negotiation process that goes along with the transformation of the German welfare state. MOs are increasingly addressed in the context of integration policy, while at the same time they are becoming more professional and are claiming a stronger role in formal security services. The discussion of the changing role of MOs in the future organization of the welfare state also sheds light on the question of the successful adaptation of social services to the needs of migrants in general.

Funder

Mercator Research Center Ruhr

Ruhr-University Bochum

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Social Sciences

Reference58 articles.

1. Auth, Diana, and Holland-Cunz, Barbara (2007). Grenzen der Bevölkerungspolitik. Strategien und Diskurse demographischer Steuerung, Verlag Barbara Budrich.

2. Bäcker, Gerhard, Naegele, Gerhard, and Bispinck, Reinhard (2020). Sozialpolitik und soziale Lage in Deutschland, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

3. BAGFW (Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der freien Wohlfahrtspflege) (2018). Gesamtstatistik 2016. Einrichtungen und Dienste der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege, Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft der Freien Wohlfahrtspflege e. V.. Available online: https://www.bagfw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Veroeffentlichungen/Publikationen/Statistik/BAGFW_Gesamtstatistik_2016.pdf.

4. Barglowski, Karolina, and Bonfert, Lisa (2022). The Affective Dimension of Social Protection: A Case Study of Migrant-Led Organizations and Associations in Germany. Social Sciences, 11.

5. Bauman, Zygmunt (2000). Liquid Modernity, Polity Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3