Affiliation:
1. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of the Free State (UFS), 205 Nelson Mandela Drive, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa
Abstract
The development of youth to actively engage in agriculture could address the persistent youth unemployment problem. For youth to actively engage in agriculture, adequate access to key productive resources is necessary. The main aim of this article is to develop and validate tailor-made development pathways based on the characteristics of four youth typologies, addressing the constrained access to key livelihood capitals, and to enhance the participation of youth in agriculture. The pathways are developed based on the Modified Sustainable Livelihood Framework (MSLF), which includes six livelihood capitals, namely, physical, natural, social, financial, human and psychological capitals. Four pathways were developed and named Business-oriented, Gender-oriented, Occupation-oriented and Livestock-oriented. Through focus group discussions, the pathways were validated to determine whether they can be used successfully to facilitate the participation of youths in agriculture. The results confirm that tailor-made development pathways can be used to develop youth characterised by the typology that informed that pathway, to actively engage in agriculture. The implementation of support strategies to support youth in agriculture, should therefore, be guided by the specific needs of different typologies. This allows for the coordination and coherence of youth support initiatives to enhance access to resources, which can yield improvements to desired development outcomes compared to initiatives implemented as piecemeals.
Funder
Water Research Commission (WRC) of South Africa
Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development
Reference57 articles.
1. Abel, Martin (2013). Unintended Labour Supply Effects of Cash Transfer Programmes: Evidence from South Africa’s Old Age Pension, University of Cape Town. SALDRU Working Paper 114.
2. Predictors of inequalities in land ownership among Nigerian households: Implications for sustainable development;Abubakar;Land Use Policy,2021
3. Determinants of Participation in Youth-in-Agriculture Programme in Ondo State, Nigeria;Adesina;Journal of Agricultural Extension,2016
4. February. Feminization, food security, and hunger eradication: A case of Omu-Aran community in Kwara State, Nigeria;Ake;IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,2020
5. Determinants of decision and participation of rural youth in acultural production: A case study of youth in Southern region of Nigeria;Akpan;Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economics Science,2015