Abstract
Extreme water incidents point out a value conflict surrounding the resource. While drought and floods echo the inadequate land and resource uses, the increase in social inequalities exposes the practical, physiological, and social consequences. The multiple value action throughout the water cycle also narrowed disputes to those that neglect its vital importance, and the constraints imposed to the services, such as low tariffs, and lack of local engagement, make sustainable water systems more difficult. This article develops a systematic literature review to understand the academic motivations surrounding water value and gaps in its systematic approach. A sample with 84 papers is created by an interactive keyword selection and its general characteristics are presented. A dynamic reading technique extracts data and classifies the papers according to 14 research motivations, where the water multifunctionality and the user value stand out. The bibliographic coupling analysis identifies a cluster of 16 papers related to integration and connected to planning, decision, and management. There is a lack of contribution with a systemic approach to water resources by way of integrating actors and values, such as including local contexts.
Subject
Water Science and Technology,Aquatic Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Biochemistry
Reference102 articles.
1. Sustainable Development Goal 6: Synthesis Report 2018 on Water and Sanitation;Water,2018
2. A Guide to SDG Interactions: From Science to Implementation;Griggs,2017
3. Infrastructure: The Social Value of Shared Resources;Frischmann,2012
4. Missing the multiple dimensions of water? Neoliberal modernization in Mexico City and Buenos Aires
5. Willingness to Pay for Improved Water Supply Services Based on Asset Management: A Contingent Valuation Study in South Korea
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献