Abstract
Evaluation by ranking/rating of data based on a multitude of indicators typically calls for multi-criteria decision analyses (MCDA) methods. MCDA methods often, in addition to indicator values, require further information, typically subjective. This paper presents a partial-order methodology as an alternative to analyze multi-indicator systems (MIS) based on indicator values that are simultaneously included in the analyses. A non-technical introduction of main concepts of partial order is given, along with a discussion of the location of partial order between statistics and MCDA. The paper visualizes examples of a ‘simple’ partial ordering of a series of chemicals to explain, in this case, unexpected behavior. Further, a generalized method to deal with qualitative inputs of stakeholders/decision makers is suggested, as well as how to disclose peculiar elements/outliers. The paper finishes by introducing formal concept analysis (FCA), which is a variety of partial ordering that allows exploration and thus the generation of implications between the indicators. In the conclusion and outlook section, take-home comments as well as pros and cons in relation to partial ordering are discussed.
Reference138 articles.
1. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, State of the Art Surveys;Figueira,2005
2. Note—A Preference Ranking Organisation Method
3. How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method
4. The PROMCALC & GAIA decision support system for multicriteria decision aid;Brans;Decis. Support Syst.,1994
5. An Improved Ranking Method for ELECTRE III;Li;Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing,2007
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献