Increase Government Support for Build-to-Rent: Should We Expect Affordable Housing?

Author:

Swanzy-Impraim Samuel1ORCID,Ge Xin Janet2ORCID,Mangioni Vince3

Affiliation:

1. School of Business, Department of Economics, Finance and Property, Western Sydney University, Parramatta, NSW 2150, Australia

2. School of Built Environment, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia

3. Faculty of Design Architecture and Building, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia

Abstract

Build-to-rent (BTR) is an important pathway for rental housing supply across the cities of Australia. The discourse has become more prevalent as stakeholders seek government support to expand the sector to provide, amongst other reform measures, affordable rental accommodation. This paper examines the effectiveness of BTR as a pathway to affordable housing supply in Australia and identifies the additional reforms needed to increase that supply further. Interviews with key stakeholders were used to assess the success of the asset class to date and how it is likely to perform in increasing affordable rental housing supply, as well as what additional reforms may be required to expedite supply. The paper found that while BTR aims to scale up rental housing supply, its limitations in its present form demonstrate the need for additional reforms. At present, unfavorable taxes, inner-city locational attributes, and ultramodern services make the asset class a high-end housing model. Experts posit that BTR rental prices are justified given the quality amenities and the 24/7 onsite professional management. While it is a premium product, several BTR projects in Australia have included portions of those projects for affordable housing. The study concluded that BTR can generate affordable housing outcomes in Australia. As more developments take place across the private sector, several regulatory reforms in land release and taxes are needed to produce a sizable portfolio of affordable BTR. Without government support and regulation through additional supply-side incentives, development and recurrent holding costs will remain high, making BTR unaffordable to many urban residents.

Funder

University of Technology Sydney, Australia

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Building and Construction,Civil and Structural Engineering,Architecture

Reference74 articles.

1. Rethinking the federal bias toward homeownership;Glaeser;Cityscape,2011

2. Thoughts on rental housing and rental housing assistance;Green;Cityscape,2011

3. Globalising homeownership: Housing privatisation schemes and the private rental sector in post-socialist Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan;Hatcher;Int. Dev. Plan. Rev.,2015

4. Abidoye, R., Ayub, B., and Ullah, F. (2022). Systematic literature review to identify the critical success factors of the build-to-rent housing model. Buildings, 12.

5. Henderson, J., Mardiamso, D., Milou, C., and Racki, E. (2021). The Evolution of Build-to-Rent: Unlocking the Opportunity in Australia, Colliers. Research Report.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3