Laboratory-Scale Limestone Rock Linear Cutting Tests with a Conical Pick: Predicting Optimal Cutting Conditions from Tool Forces

Author:

Kim Han-eol1ORCID,Hwang Sung-pil1,Yoo Wan-kyu1,Kim Woo-seok1ORCID,Kim Chang-yong1,Yoo Han-kyu2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283 Goyangdae-ro, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10223, Republic of Korea

2. Department of Civil and Environmental System Engineering, Hanyang University, 55 Hanyangdaehak-ro, Songnok-gu, Ansan-si 15588, Republic of Korea

Abstract

This study introduces a simplified method for predicting the optimal cutting conditions to maximize excavation efficiency based on tool forces. A laboratory-scale linear rock-cutting test was conducted using a conical pick on Finike limestone. The tool forces and their ratios were analyzed in relation to cutting parameters such as penetration depth and spacing. While the cutting force (FC) and normal force (FN) increased with the penetration depth and spacing, this relationship could not predict the optimal cutting conditions. The ratio of the mean normal force to the mean cutting force (FNm/FCm) increased with the penetration depth and the ratio of spacing to penetration depth (s/d). However, even while including this relationship, predicting optimal cutting conditions remained challenging. The ratio of the peak cutting force to the mean cutting force (FCp/FCm) reached a maximum value at a specific s/d, which is similar to the relationship between the specific energy (SE) and s/d. The optimal s/d obtained through the SE methodology was found to be between 3 and 5, and FCp/FCm reached a maximum at s/d. The error between the optimal s/d and the s/d in which FCp/FCm was maximized was less than 5%. Therefore, it was confirmed that the optimal cutting conditions could be predicted through the relationship between FCp/FCm and s/d. Additionally, by using the results from previous studies, the optimal cutting conditions obtained from the SE methodology and the proposed methodology were found to agree within a margin of error of 20%. The proposed methodology can be beneficial for the design of cutter heads and the operation of excavation machines.

Funder

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3