The Economic Impact Associated with the Direct Connection Strength of Micropiles in Foundation Retrofit Projects

Abstract

Building foundations are usually retrofitted with directly connected micropiles; however, at the present time, there are different approaches for predicting shear capacity in the micropile–foundation connection. At first, the concrete shear strength was considered. Nowadays, in the EU countries, it is prescribed to use the shear strength of the interface between successive concrete casts at different times. This implies a reduction of the connection capacity by half, and these values are not in consonance with the lab results. This work analyses the economic impact of the previous considerations on retrofit projects with micropiles. To this aim, firstly, seven different formulations were applied to 29 building projects, and the results were compared. Secondly, a Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis was performed using bond stress distribution data obtained from lab tests. Thus, numerical results acquired by comparing European and American regulations show an average difference in cost of around 40%, which may reach up to 50%. Moreover, the Monte Carlo simulation confirms that the connection strength may become a limitation in retrofit projects, also indicating that the application of European codes usually leads to the most expensive designs. Finally, the results show that it is not worth improving the connection to exceed a bond stress of 0.60 MPa, since no relevant savings are produced by achieving higher values.