What Can Laboratory Animal Facility Managers Do to Improve the Welfare of Laboratory Animals and Laboratory Animal Facility Staff? A German Perspective

Author:

von der Beck Birte1ORCID,Wissmann Andreas1,Tolba Rene H.2ORCID,Dammann Philip1ORCID,Hilken Gero1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Central Animal Laboratory, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany

2. Institute for Laboratory Animal Science & Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany

Abstract

Laboratory animal facility managers must ensure that animal experiments can be carried out under optimal scientific conditions, that all legal requirements are met, and that animal welfare is maximized. Animal experimentation is stressful not only for the animals involved but also for the people who maintain these animals or carry out the experiments. Many of those involved find themselves in a constant conflict between scientific necessity, care, and harm. Under the term Culture of Care, procedures have been developed to reduce the burden of animal experimentation on the animals and the staff involved. The focus here is on what laboratory animal facility managers can do to improve the welfare of laboratory animals and the people working with them. Exemplary measures are the improvement of the housing conditions of laboratory animals, the introduction of uniform handling measures, clear and transparent structures via a quality management system, implementation of a no-blame culture of error (e.g., via Critical Incident Reporting System in Laboratory Animal Science [CIRS-LAS]), and open and respectful communication with all parties involved in animal experimentation, including the public and representatives of the authorities (public webpage, open house policy). The 6 Rs must be considered at all times: replacement, reduction, refinement, respect, responsibility, and reproducibility. We are writing this article from the perspective of laboratory animal facility managers in Germany.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference62 articles.

1. Public Attitudes toward Animal Research: A Review;Ormandy;Animals,2014

2. Council of the European Union (2010). European Parliament Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. OJEU, 276, 33–79. Available online: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/169b16db-cb47-46e3-aff5-caa8009ec295/language-en.

3. Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities;Brown;Management of Animal Care and Use Programs in Research, Education, and Testing,2018

4. LaFollette, H., and Shanks, N. (1997). Brute Science: Dilemmas of Animal Experimentation, Routledge.

5. Lorz, A., and Metzger, E. (2019). Tierschutzgesetz, C.H.BECK. [7th ed.].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3