Comparing Methods for the Regionalization of Intensity−Duration−Frequency (IDF) Curve Parameters in Sparsely-Gauged and Ungauged Areas of Central Chile

Author:

Sangüesa Claudia12,Pizarro Roberto1234,Ingram Ben5ORCID,Ibáñez Alfredo12,Rivera Diego6ORCID,García-Chevesich Pablo7ORCID,Pino Juan8ORCID,Pérez Felipe9,Balocchi Francisco10ORCID,Peña Francisco1

Affiliation:

1. UNESCO Chair Surface Hydrology, University of Talca, Talca 3467769, Chile

2. Centro Nacional de Excelencia Para la Industria de la Madera (CENAMAD), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7810128, Chile

3. Instituto Interdisciplinario Para la Innovación, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3467769, Chile

4. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, La Pintana, Santiago 8820808, Chile

5. School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK

6. Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad del Desarrollo, Avenida Plaza 600, Santiago 7610687, Chile

7. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA

8. Dirección de Transferencia Tecnológica, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago 8330367, Chile

9. Dirección General de Aguas, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Santiago 8340652, Chile

10. Ecosystems, Productivity and Climate Change, Bioforest SA, Camino a Coronel km 15, Coronel 413000, Chile

Abstract

Estimating intensity−duration−frequency (IDF) curves requires local historical information of precipitation intensity. When such information is unavailable, as in areas without rain gauges, it is necessary to consider other methods to estimate curve parameters. In this study, three methods were explored to estimate IDF curves in ungauged areas: Kriging (KG), Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW), and Storm Index (SI). To test the viability of these methods, historical data collected from 31 rain gauges distributed in central Chile, 35° S to 38° S, are used. As a result of the reduced number of rain gauges to evaluate the performance of each method, we used LOOCV (Leaving One Out Cross Validation). The results indicate that KG was limited due to the sparse distribution of rain gauges in central Chile. SI (a linear scaling method) showed the smallest prediction error in all of the ungauged locations, and outperformed both KG and IDW. However, the SI method does not provide estimates of uncertainty, as is possible with KG. The simplicity of SI renders it a viable method for extrapolating IDF curves to locations without data in the central zone of Chile.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology,Oceanography

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3