The Relationship between Firm Attributes and Attitudes towards Diversity

Author:

Fodor Máté Miklós12,Komorowski Marlen23ORCID,Turegeldinova Aliya1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Management and Mathematical Economics, Satbayev University, Satpaev Street 22, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan

2. JOMEC—School of Journalism, Media and Culture, Cardiff University, 2 Central Square, Cardiff CF10 1FS, UK

3. IMEC-VUB-SMIT (Studies on Media, Innovation and Technology), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

The attitudes of creative firms towards issues of equality, diversity and inclusiveness (“EDI”) can significantly affect their willingness to sponsor and implement effective measures in the domain. It is, therefore, essential to examine the readily measurable firm attributes that influence these attitudes. We have collected a wide range of data on almost 330 creative businesses. Our empirical investigation establishes a robust and unequivocal pattern. It indicates that more established companies tend not to view the underrepresentation or the discrimination of people with various protected characteristics as problematic. Young, innovative and efficient firms on the other hand are systematically more likely to consider these same issues as prevalent. These findings are in line with the conclusions from the previous literature which relied predominantly on anecdotal evidence. The patterns that we document suggest that EDI policies and recommendations must be tailored to the precise characteristics of the firm implementing them.

Funder

UKRI

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference76 articles.

1. UNCTAD (2018). Creative Economy Outlook: Trends in International Trade in Creative Industries, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

2. Banks, M. (2020). Racialized Bodies, Disabling Worlds: Storied Lives of Immigrant Muslim Women, Syracuse University Press.

3. Pratt, A.C., and Jeffcutt, P. (2009). Creativity, Innovation and the Cultural Economy, Routledge.

4. Cunningham, S., Craig, D., and Kagan, C. (2019). Beyond Creative Industries: Mapping Australia’s Creative Economy in 2016, ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation.

5. Watson, J. (2019). Creative Labour, Cultural Work and Inequality: Challenges for Social Policy, Routledge.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3