Numerical Evaluation of Aircraft Aerodynamic Static and Dynamic Stability Derivatives by a Mid-Fidelity Approach

Author:

Granata Daniele1,Savino Alberto1ORCID,Zanotti Alex1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, Politecnico di Milano, Via La Masa 34, 20156 Milan, Italy

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the capability of mid-fidelity aerodynamic solvers in performing a preliminary evaluation of the static and dynamic stability derivatives of aircraft configurations in their design phase. In this work, the mid-fidelity aerodynamic solver DUST, which is based on the novel vortex particle method (VPM), was used to perform simulations of the static and dynamic motion conditions of the Stability And Control CONfiguration (SACCON): an unmanned combat aerial vehicle geometry developed by NATO’s Research and Technology Organisation (RTO), which is used as a benchmark test case in the literature for the evaluation of aircraft stability derivatives. Two different methods were exploited to extract the dynamic stability derivative values from the aerodynamic coefficient time histories that were calculated with DUST. The results for the mid-fidelity approach were in good agreement with the obtained experimental data, as well as with the results obtained using more demanding high-fidelity CFD simulations. This demonstrates its suitability when implemented in DUST for predicting the static and dynamic behavior of airloads in different conditions, as well as in reliably predicting the values of stability derivatives, with the advantage of requiring limited computational effort with respect to classical high-fidelity numerical approaches and the use of wind tunnel tests.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference24 articles.

1. Vicroy, D.D., Loeser, T.D., and Schuette, A. (2010). SACCON Forced Oscillation Tests at DNW-NWB and NASA Langley 14 × 22-Foot Tunnel, NASA Technical Report.

2. Orlik-Ruckemann, K. (1981). Lecture Series-114, AGARD Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.

3. Schultz, D., and Jones, T. (1973). Advisory Group for Aerospace Research & Development, AGARD-AG-165 Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. Technical Report.

4. Schütte, A., Cummings, R.M., Stern, F., and Toxopeus, S. (2009). NATO RTO Technical Report, RTO-AVT-TR-161 on “Assessment of Stability and Control Prediction Methods for NATO Air and Sea Vehicles”, NATO RTO—Research and Technology Organisation.

5. Cummings, R.M., and Schütte, A. (2014, January 16–20). The NATO STO Task Group AVT-201 on ‘Extended Assessment of Stability and Control Prediction Methods for NATO Air Vehicles’. Proceedings of the 32nd AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3