Mathematical Modelling of a Propellent Gauging System: A Case Study on PRISMA

Author:

Shaik Riyaaz Uddien1ORCID,Relangi Naresh2,Thangavel Kathiravan23ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, 00138 Rome, Italy

2. School of Aerospace Engineering, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, 00138 Rome, Italy

3. Sir Lawrence Wackett Defence & Aerospace Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia

Abstract

Propellant gauging is crucial for a spacecraft approaching the end of its lifespan. Current gauging systems for satellites typically have an accuracy rate of a few months to a year at the end of their operational life. Therefore, it is essential to determine the appropriate gauging system for mission operations. This research focuses on modeling the propellant gauging system for PRISMA, an Earth Observation (EO) satellite of the Italian Space Agency. The analysis centers on implementing algorithms that calibrate the remaining propellant mass in the satellite tank using traditional methods such as bookkeeping (BKP) and pressure-volume-temperature (PVT). To enhance accuracy in quantification, an unconventional approach called thermal propellant gauging (TPG) has been considered. Preliminary computations were conducted using data obtained from the PRISMA thermal model to understand the calibration accuracy of the three methods. At the end of its operational life, the BKP and PVT methods exhibited error rates of 4.6% and 4.8%, respectively, in calculating the mass. In contrast, the TPG method demonstrated a significantly higher precision with an error rate of 1.86%. However, at the beginning of the satellite’s operational life, the PVT and TPG methods showed error rates of 1.0% and 1.3%, respectively, while the BKP technique reported an error rate of 0.1%. Based on these findings, it has been concluded that combining the BKP and TPG approaches yields superior results throughout the satellite’s lifespan. Furthermore, the researchers have determined the specific time duration for which each of these distinct approaches can be effectively utilized.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Aerospace Engineering

Reference31 articles.

1. Goff, J., Zegler, F., Bienhoff, D., Marchetta, J., Kutter, B., and Chandler, F. (2009, January 14–17). Realistic Near-Term Propellant Depots: Implementation of a Critical Spacefaring Capability. Proceedings of the AIAA Space 2009 Conference & Exposition, Pasadena, CA, USA.

2. (2023, February 02). NASA Technology Roadmaps TA 2: In-Space Propulsion Technologies, Available online: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/2015_nasa_technology_roadmaps_ta_2_in-space_propulsion_final.pdf.

3. Review of Propellant Gauging Methods;Yendler;Proceedings of the 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting,2006

4. Hufenbach, B., Brandt, R., Andre, G., Voeten, R., van Put, P., Sanders, B., Schwer, A., Delil, A., Mastenbroek, O., and Pauw, A. (1997, January 27–29). Comparative Assessment of Gauging Systems and Description of a Liquid Level Gauging Concept for a Spin Stabilized Spacecraft. Proceedings of the Second European Spacecraft Propulsion Conference, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. ESA SP-287.

5. Hasan, D., Jaeger, M., Oren, A., Adler, S., Miller, N., and Zemer, E. (2004, January 2–9). Application of Satellite Hydrazine Propulsion System. Proceedings of the 4th International Spacecraft Propulsion Conference (ESA SP-555), Chia Laguna (Cagliari), Sardinia, Italy.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3