Affiliation:
1. Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
2. Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
Abstract
We used published data consisting of 263 treatment mean observations from beef cattle and dairy steers and heifers, in which CH4 was measured via chambers or head boxes, to evaluate relationships between enteric CH4 production and dry matter intake (DMI) and dietary components. Daily DMI was positively related (slope = 15.371, p < 0.001) to total daily production (g/d) of CH4 (r2 = 0.821). Among chemical components, dietary neutral detergent fiber (NDF) concentration was the most highly related (r2 = 0.696; slope = 0.2001; p < 0.001) to CH4 yield (g/kg of DMI), with strong relationships also noted for dietary starch:NDF ratio (r2 = 0.662; slope = −2.4587; p < 0.001), starch (r2 = 0.495; slope = −0.106; p < 0.001), and the proportion of metabolizable energy relative to gross energy (r2 = 0.561; slope = −23.663; p < 0.001). The slope (−0.5871) and intercept (22.2295) for the dietary ether extract vs. CH4 yield were significant (p < 0.001), but the relationship was highly variable (r2 = 0.150). For dietary crude protein concentration, the slope for CH4 yield was not significant (−0.0344; p < 0.381) with an r2 value near zero. Decreasing DMI by programming body weight gain or restricting feed intake could decrease CH4 production in confined cattle, but these approaches might negatively affect growth performance and product quality, potentially negating positive effects on CH4 production. Feeding higher-quality forages or using grazing management systems that decrease dietary NDF concentrations or substituting grain (starch) for forage should decrease both CH4 yield from enteric production and manure CH4 production via increased digestibility. Effects of feeding management and diet formulation strategies should be additive with other mitigation approaches such as feed additives, allowing the cattle industry to achieve maximal decreases in enteric CH4 production, while concurrently maintaining optimal beef production.
Reference31 articles.
1. United States Department of Agriculture—Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS) (2023, October 19). Sector at a Glance, Available online: https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/sector-at-a-glance/.
2. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2022, March 15). Draft Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2016, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-01/documents/2018_complete_report.pdf.
3. Redirecting rumen fermentation to reduce methanogenesis;McAllister;Aust. J. Exp. Agric.,2008
4. Predicting metabolizable energy from digestible energy for growing and finishing beef cattle and relationships to the prediction of methane;Hales;J. Anim. Sci.,2022
5. Prediction of methane per unit of dry matter intake in growing and finishing cattle from the ratio of dietary concentrations of starch to neutral detergent fiber alone or in combination with dietary concentration of ether extract;Galyean;J. Anim. Sci.,2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献