Abstract
The failure of hip prostheses is a problem that requires further investigation and analysis. Although total hip replacement is an extremely successful operation, the number of revision surgeries needed after this procedure is expected to continue to increase due to issues with both bone cement types and cementation techniques (depending on the producer). To conduct a comparative analysis, as a surgeon prepared the bone cement and introduced it in the body, this study’s team of researchers prepared three types of commercial bone cements with the samples mixed and placed them in specimens, following the timeline of the surgery. In order to evaluate the factors that influenced the chemical composition and structure of each bone cement sample under specific intraoperative conditions, analyses of the handling properties, mechanical properties, structure, and composition were carried out. The results show that poor handling can impede prosthesis–cement interface efficacy over time. Therefore, it is recommended that manual mixing be avoided as much as possible, as the manual preparation of the cement can sometimes lead to structural unevenness.
Subject
General Materials Science
Reference78 articles.
1. Modification of titanium surface with collagen and doxycycline as a new approach in dental implants
2. Correlations between connector geometry and strength of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures
3. Complications Related to Biocomposite Screw Fixation in ACL Reconstruction Based on Clinical Experience and Retrieval Analysis;Marinescu;Mater. Plast.,2015
4. Application of a biphasic macroporous synthetic bone substitutes CERAFORM®: clinical and histological results
5. Microstructure Development in Titanium and Its Alloys Used for Medical Applications;Gheorghe;UPB Sci. Bull. Ser. B Chem. Mater. Sci.,2019
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献