Abstract
Internationally, primate research takes place in laboratories, zoos, sanctuaries, and the wild. All of these settings present unique advantages and challenges in terms of methodology, translatability, animal welfare, and ethics. In this novel commentary, we explore the scientific and ethical benefits and drawbacks of conducting non-invasive psychological research with primates in each setting. We also suggest ways to overcome some of the barriers. We argue that while there may be greater experimental control in laboratory-based research, settings that more closely mirror primates’ natural habitats are generally better suited to meet their specialized needs. More naturalistic research settings, including field studies, may also circumvent some ethical concerns associated with research in captivity, and yield more ecologically valid data.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference130 articles.
1. Carvalho, C., Gaspar, A., Knight, A., and Vicente, L. (2019). Ethical and scientific pitfalls concerning laboratory research with non-human primates, and possible solutions. Animals, 9.
2. Behavioral Research on Captive Animals: Scientific and Ethical Concerns;Herrmann;Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change,2019
3. Use of nonhuman primates in research in North America;Lankau;J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci.,2014
4. Primate cognition in zoos: Reviewing the impact of zoo-based research over 15 years;McEwen;Am. J. Primatol.,2022
5. Primates are living links to our past: The contribution of comparative studies with wild vervet monkeys to the field of social cognition;Mertz;Cortex,2019
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献