Oat–Field Pea Intercropping for Sustainable Oat Production: Effect on Yield, Nutritive Value and Environmental Impact
-
Published:2023-02-14
Issue:4
Volume:15
Page:3514
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Tamiru Metekia12ORCID, Alkhtib Ashraf3, Belachew Basha2, Demeke Solomon2, Worku Zemene2, Wamatu Jane4, Burton Emily3
Affiliation:
1. Department of Veterinary and Biosciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Heidestraat 19, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium 2. Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma P.O. Box 307, Ethiopia 3. School of Animal, Rural and Environmental Sciences, Brackenhurst Campus, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell NG25 0QF, UK 4. International Centre for Agricultural Research in Dry Areas, Addis Ababa P.O. Box 5689, Ethiopia
Abstract
The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of Oat–field pea intercropping on the yield, nutritive value, and environmental impact of oat grown under a reduced level of nitrogen fertilisation. The trial was laid out in a randomized complete block design with the following treatments: oat-0 (oat (Avena sativa L., SRCP X 80 Ab 2291 variety) without N fertilization (urea)), oat-23 (oat fertilised with 23 kg N/ha), oat-46 (oat fertilised with 46 kg N/ha), O1P1 (oat intercropped with field pea (Pisum sativum L., local variety) a ratio of 1:1), O1P2 (oat intercropped with field pea a ratio of 1:2), and O2P1 (oat intercropped with field pea at a ratio of 2:1). All of the experimental plots received standard husbandry practices except for nitrogen fertilisation. Soil pH, organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, and organic carbon were determined before and after planting. The effect of nitrogen fertilization and intercropping of oat with field pea on carbon footprint, acidification footprint, eutrophication footprint, and human toxicity footprint was calculated for each plot. Oat-0 significantly reduced the total nitrogen content of the soil, while there was no significant effect of the other treatments. O2P1 significantly out-yielded all control groups; however, it was not significantly different from fertilisation treatments. Intercropping with field pea did not significantly increase the cost of production of dry matter, crude protein, or dry matter digestibility compared to control groups. Intercropping with field pea significantly reduced the carbon footprint, acidification, eutrophication, and human toxicity footprint compared to the control groups. Therefore, oat–field pea intercrops are recommended for the production of high-quality forage at low N input with reduced environmental impact.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference49 articles.
1. (2021, September 21). FAOSTAT FAO Statistical Databas. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. 2. Motsara, M.R., and Roy, R.N. (2008). Guide to Laboratory Establishment for Plant Nutrient Analysis, Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations Rome. 3. Livestock Production Challenges and Improved Forage Production Efforts in the Damot Gale District of Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia;Mengistu;Adv. Agric.,2021 4. Performance Evaluation of Improved Oat Varieties/Accessions at East Guji Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia;Dinkale;Ecol. Evol. Biol.,2020 5. Evaluation of Biomass Yield and Nutritional Quality of Oats-Vetch Mixtures at Different Harvesting Stage under Residual Moisture in Fogera District, Ethiopia;Molla;Agric. Food Secur.,2018
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|