Affiliation:
1. Centre for Agribusiness Biotechnology Research, University of Almería, La Cañada de S. Urbano, s/n, ES-04120 Almería, Spain
2. Department of Mathematics, University of Almería, La Cañada de S. Urbano, s/n, ES-04120 Almería, Spain
3. HUN-REN Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Evolution, Konkoly-Thege Miklosut 29–33, H-1121 Budapest, Hungary
Abstract
Over recent decades, intraguild predation (IGP) has attracted special attention, both from the theoretical and practical standpoints. The present paper addresses the interference competition between two Trichogramma species (egg parasitoids)—on the one hand, the extrinsic interactions (i.e., the indirect competition between female T. achaeae and T. brassicae), and on the other, the intrinsic interactions between the larvae of both species. Furthermore, T. achaeae is a better competitor than T. brassicae due to a dual mechanism—the former acts as a facultative hyperparasitoid of the latter, exclusively considering parasitism relationships as well as presenting predation activity by host feeding, which gives preference to eggs previously parasitized by T. brassicae over non-parasitized eggs. Both mechanisms are dependent on the prey density, which is demonstrated by a change in the functional response (i.e., the relationship between the numbers of prey attacked at different prey densities) of T. achaeae adult female—it changes from type II (i.e., initial phase in which the number of attacked targets increases hyperbolically and then reaches an asymptote, reflecting the handling capacity of the predator), in the absence of competition (an instantaneous search rate of a′ = 9.996 ± 4.973 days−1 and a handling time of Th = 0.018 ± 0.001 days), to type I (i.e., linear increase in parasitism rate as host densities rise, until reaching a maximum parasitism rate, and an instantaneous search rate of a′ = 0.879 ± 0.072 days−1 and a handling time of Th ≈ 0) when interference competition is present. These results show that there is a greater mortality potential of this species, T. achaeae, in conditions of competition with other species, T. brassicae in this case. Based on this, their implications in relation to the biological control of pests by parasitoid species are discussed.
Funder
Ministry of Economy, Innovation, and Science of the Andalusian Regional Government
Reference71 articles.
1. Gunn, A., and Pitt, S.J. (2022). Parasitology: An Integrated Approach, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.. [2nd ed.].
2. Parasitoid guilds: Defining the structure of the parasitoid community of endopterygote insect hosts;Mills;Environ. Entomol.,1994
3. Foottit, R.G., and Adler, P.H. (2017). Parasitoid biodiversity and insect pest management. Insect Biodiversity, John Wiley & Sons. [2nd ed.].
4. Quicke, D.L.J. (1997). Parasitic Wasps, Chapman & Hall.
5. Intrinsic inter- and intraspecific competition in parasitoid wasps;Harvey;Annu. Rev. Entomol.,2013