Pesticide: A Contemporary Cultural Object

Author:

Fusar Poli Elena1,Fontefrancesco Michele Filippo123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Gastronomic Sciences, Piazza Vittorio Emanuele II 9, Fr. Pollenzo, 12042 Bra, Italy

2. Department of Anthropology, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

3. Department of Sociology, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth, Largo Gemelli, 1, 20123 Milan, Italy

Abstract

The article provides a narrative review of the social and cultural interpretation of pesticides in contemporary society. In so doing, it highlights the main fields of exploration investigated by social scientists concerning the perception and role played by these products among farmers and consumers. Following the WHO definition, pesticides are chemical compounds used to kill pests, including insects, rodents, fungi, and unwanted plants. They are contemporary cultural artefacts that social sciences explore in synergy with other disciplines to highlight their socio-cultural connections at both local and global levels. Specifically, the use of these products is connected with power relations, which are embedded in and reflect imbalances and inequalities in access to rights and resources, as well as specific articulation of the perception of risk arising from environmental contamination in terms of individual and collective psychophysical health. Furthermore, pesticides fit into various environmental conceptions and multiple local knowledge systems, representing the intersection of different cultural heritages, worldviews, and rationales that make the tradition–modernity dichotomy complex and dynamic. In this respect, therefore, pesticides can be understood not just as mere tools for agricultural practice but as vital windows through which to investigate multiple layers of meaning to support transitions towards sustainable pest management systems, both environmentally and socio-culturally.

Funder

EU PRIMA program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference69 articles.

1. WHO (2024, February 01). Chemical Safety: Pesticides. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/chemical-safety-pesticides.

2. EPA (2024, February 20). What Are Biopesticides?, Available online: https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/what-are-biopesticides.

3. Stetkiewicz, S., Bruce, A., Burnett, F.J., Ennos, R.A., and Topp, C.F.E. (2022). An Interdisciplinary Method for Assessing IPM Potential: Case Study in Scottish Spring Barley. CABI Agric. Biosci., 3.

4. Andreazza, A.C., and Scola, G. (2015). Toxicology Studies—Cells, Drugs and Environment, InTech.

5. Perceived Legitimacy of Agricultural Transitions and Implications for Governance. Lessons Learned from England’s Post-Brexit Agricultural Transition;Rose;Land Use Policy,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3