Abstract
From 1998, land-use regulations in New South Wales Australia referred to risk status of plant community types and abiotic landscapes. Lacking was a uniform vegetation classification for 77% of NSW comprising the inland arid, semi-arid and cropping agricultural zones: regions that contain patchy floristic plot data. In response, 562 plant communities, mainly at levels 8 in the IVC, were classified by synthesizing plot-based analyses, qualitative descriptions, maps, extensive field checks, new field samples and peer review. Qualitative information was vital to complete a thorough classification. Each type was assigned a risk category based on six risk assessment criteria developed prior to IUCN RLE. Occurrences in protected areas were audited and related to original extent yielding a protected area/adequacy code. Results were used in land change assessment tools and contributed to the listing of 40 threatened ecological communities under biodiversity laws. Two mapping methods attained different levels of reliability. Applying risk criteria to coarse versus fine levels in typologies can produce different results. Mid-to fine level global hierarchies best suit ecosystem risk assessment.
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Global and Planetary Change
Reference71 articles.
1. The New Bioinformatics: Integrating Ecological Data from the Gene to the Biosphere
2. Ecological Units: Definitions and Application
3. Ecological Systems of the United States: A Working Classification of U.S. Terrestrial Systems;Comer,2003
4. A framework and toolkit for scoring the biodiversity value of habitat, and the biodiversity benefits of land use change
5. BioMetric Version 1.8: A Terrestrial Biodiversity Assessment Tool for the NSW Property Vegetation Plan Developer Operational Manualhttps://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/pestsweeds/biometric_manual_1_8.pdf