Abstract
Advances in technology and digitalization offer huge potential for improving the performance of production systems. However, human limitations often function as an obstacle in realizing these improvements. This article argues that the discrepancy between potential and reality is caused by design features of technologies, also called ironies of automation. To this, the psychological mechanisms that cause these ironies are illustrated by the example of operators of a chocolate wrapping machine, and their effect is explained by basic theories of engineering psychology. This article concludes that engineers need to understand these basic theories and interdisciplinary teamwork is necessary to improve the design of digital technologies and enable harmonious, high-performance human–machine cooperation.
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Control and Optimization,Mechanical Engineering,Computer Science (miscellaneous),Control and Systems Engineering
Reference50 articles.
1. Ironies of Automation;Bainbridge;Automatica,1983
2. Baxter, G., Rooksby, J., Wang, Y., and Khajeh-Hosseini, A. (2012, January 28). The Ironies of Automation: Still Going Strong at 30?. Proceedings of the 30th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics, Edinburgh, UK.
3. Ironies of Automation: Still Unresolved After All These Years;Strauch;IEEE Trans. Hum. Mach. Syst.,2017
4. Taylor, F.W. (1947). Scientific Management, Harper and Row.
5. Coping with Complexity: Past, Present and Future;Hollnagel;Cogn. Technol. Work,2012
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献