Revisiting Urban Resilience: A Systematic Review of Multiple-Scale Urban Form Indicators in Flood Resilience Assessment
-
Published:2024-06-14
Issue:12
Volume:16
Page:5076
-
ISSN:2071-1050
-
Container-title:Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Sustainability
Author:
Mabrouk Mahmoud12ORCID, Han Haoying13ORCID, Mahran Mahran Gamal N.14ORCID, Abdrabo Karim I.2ORCID, Yousry Ahmed2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China 2. Faculty of Urban and Regional Planning, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt 3. Faculty of Innovation and Design, City University of Macau, Macau 4. Department of Architecture, El Minya High Institute for Engineering and Technology, Minya 61784, Egypt
Abstract
Despite the increasing number of flood studies, the interrelationships between urban form indices (UFIs) and flood resilience (FR) have received little attention and hold miscellaneous perspectives. Consequentially, this study identifies how UFIs at various spatial scales affect FR by synthesizing article findings and proposing insights for future research. Scientometric analysis has been used to analyze the gathered peer-reviewed articles from nine research engines without time restrictions. One hundred and eighteen relevant articles were included and thoroughly investigated using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. Our findings indicate that divergent and dialectical perspectives about the efficacy of UFIs are due to multiple disciplines, methodologies, and different case study contexts. The included studies were classified according to urban scale as macro (citywide), meso (districts), micro (block), and multi-scalar analysis by 80.5%, 6.8%, 10.2%, and 2.4%, respectively. Furthermore, the included studies were categorized based on analysis type into realistic case studies, literature reviews, modeling, and hybrid analysis, with 74.6%, 7.6%, 14.4%, and 3.4%, respectively. At the macroscale, city density and spatial distribution degree have the most significant effect on FR. At the same time, mixed uses, connectivity, coverage ratio, block arrangements, and street characteristics are on the meso and micro scales. Further studies on the trade-offs and commonality between UFIs, FR, and overall urban resilience are required to shape climate-adaptive, sustainable communities.
Funder
Center for Balance Architecture of Zhejiang University
Reference319 articles.
1. U.N.—DESA (2024, April 21). 68% of the World Population Projected to Live in Urban Areas by 2050, Says UN|UN DESA|United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html. 2. Abdrabo, K.I., Mabrouk, M., and Marzouk, A. (2024). Urban Competitiveness Assessment Using the Integration of the Global Power City Index and Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods. J. Urban Plan. Dev., 150. 3. Mohammed, G.A., Mabrouk, M., and He, G. (2023). Towards Sustainable Cities: A Review of Zero Energy Buildings Techniques and Global Activities in Residential Buildings. Energies, 16. 4. Abdrabo, K.I., Mabrouk, M., Han, H., Saber, M., Kantoush, S.A., and Sumi, T. (2024). Mapping COVID-19’s potential infection risk based on land use characteristics: A case study of commercial activities in two Egyptian cities. Heliyon, 10. 5. Mabrouk, M., Han, H., Abdrabo, K.I., Gamal, M., Mahran, N., Antar, S., Aboukorin, A., Nasrallah, S., Shen, G., and Fan, C. (2024). Science of the Total Environment Spatial congruency or discrepancy? Exploring the spatiotemporal dynamics of built-up expansion patterns and flood risk. Sci. Total Environ., 915.
|
|